this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
310 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24578 readers
2459 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.is/rQuTE

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 84 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

To echo another commenter, this article is a harrowing read—particularly the litany of reasons for declaring independence:

The Declaration pronounces these rights to be so important that it’s worth overthrowing a government over them. But one should not undertake revolution against a tyrannical government lightly, the Declaration says, going on to provide a massive litany of complaints as justification. In modern times, the full list was considered to be the boring part of this document, lacking the vim and vigor of “we hold these truths to be self-evident” and other such bars from the preamble. But this year, it’s become a… bracing read.

Listed among the reasons to boot the British monarch are:

  • “transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences”
  • “Obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither”
  • “erect[ing] a multitude of New Offices, and sen[ding] hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people”
  • keeping “among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures”
  • attempting “to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.”
  • “cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world”
  • “depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury”
  • “excit[ing] domestic insurrections amongst us”

This was visceral:

As Donald Trump’s imperial presidency rolls forward across the wreckage of Congress on tank treads greased by the Supreme Court...

And it ends with this:

The Declaration of Independence has some notes about “the Right of the People to alter or to abolish” its existing government “and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

But that was another time, right? Surely nobody wants to take the Founding Fathers’ original words literally. Their original meaning and original intent can’t just be superimposed on American life today, not when American values are very different from the values of 1776. In Trump’s America, the national ethos is simply a boot on your neck, forever.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 33 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

overcoming denial isn't something anyone can do for someone else--each person has to make that decision on their own. and it's even harder when everyone around you is in the same state of denial.

until there's a critical mass of people who finally realize a) none of what's going on is remotely acceptable; and more importantly b) nothing that's been tried so far has worked, and WILL NOT work moving forward--

until then, it's boot on neck. maybe forever

edit: add c) "the law" is meaningless if no one's enforcing it. or if the only laws getting enforced are the ones that protect the fascists. i cringe at every post declaring "court rules that trump can't do that thing he literally did and will continue to do!!" good job, court.

[–] Nusm@piefed.zip 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

overcoming denial isn't something anyone can do for someone else--each person has to make that decision on their own. and it's even harder when everyone around you is in the same state of denial.

You can’t reason someone out of a position that they didn’t reason themselves into.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 hours ago

God damnit

Thar hits in the feels, man, warn me next time! 😆

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 14 hours ago

I came with the same excerpt as your first.

I disagree with the bit about the king, though, because like the monarchy of the UK, he's largely there to force us to bow to the jackal and vulture gods of capitalism. Now we have a choice. Will we sacrifice ourselves and children to those false gods, or make the necessary choice of perhaps more difficult sacrifices to the more merciful egalitarian ideals? We may never realize them, in any lifetime. I suppose that largely depends on how much the collective values themselves over capitalists.