this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
910 points (98.7% liked)

Political Memes

8739 readers
3522 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 130 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Congratulations, dipshit [Schumer, not OP], you've done something perfectly counterproductive by (a) making it sound like (presumably) something that's less of a blatant Orwellian farce that turned people against it just because of the name, and (b) creating confusion that makes it harder to organize against it because now there are two different names out there.

[–] stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think you're giving Schumer way too much credit in saying changing the bill's name is counterproductive.

Is Trump going to stop calling it the big beautiful bill? Are his minions going to change their branding? Of course not.

Are Democrats and liberals going to stop calling it the big ugly bill or whatever other parody names they use? Of course not.

And once the bill passes, which it will, the name of the bill will mean absolutely nothing.

Changing the bill's name isn't counterproductive. It's just a complete waste of time that lets Schumer - virtue signaling asshat that he is - pretend he's doing something despite not having the guts to fight Trump on anything.

[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know him irl. Not personally, not well, but I've interacted with him several times. He is cheap despite being well off. He is not nice unless he thinks you could do something for him. He looks down on people he perceives as beneath him. He has a mean streak. Him making a show of being a good guy but doing nothing in actuality makes sense.

[–] FarmTaco@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Him making a show of being a good guy but doing nothing in actuality makes sense.

I just kind of assume this of career politicians. How can you sit in there for so long, doing nothing, just taking payout after payout

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

Those who don't of it, don't get any votes.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, fine: he tried to be counterproductive and still managed to fail at it.

You know what, I can agree with that 😆

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

also like it clearly didn’t solve anything even optically bc this website is still up https://www.whitehouse.gov/obbb/