this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
620 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24548 readers
2668 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than half of Americans believe that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has gone “too far” in its pursuit of arresting migrants, according to a new poll.

While 54 percent said ICE has used its power too aggressively, the sentiment was even greater among Democrats at 83%, according to a poll by PBS News, NP and Marist.

Nearly half of Republicans, by contrast, said ICE’s actions are appropriate and an additional 31% said the agency had not gone far enough in enforcing Donald Trump’s mass deportation agenda.

The vast majority of Americans (80%) support the U.S. government's deportation of migrants without permanent legal status who have been convicted of a violent crime.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their opinion doesn't count, as long as the big corporations and racist lobbyists are happy, the people's will means nothing.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That's only when the wealthy own both parties...

They don't control the DNC anymore, and trying to make trump do what you already paid him to do is an exercise in futility.

Shit looks bad for everyone right now, including the wealthy.

Which is why the media is pushing people to disengage from politics.

Don't do what billionaires want you to do, it's never in your favor.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As a non American I'm not sure how you're going to overcome this, if the bill passes the house you've essentially given Trump a loyal private army given the ICE budget and it doesn't look like anyone has the stomach to do what's needed in opposition. Democrats are still attacking Mamdani lol, the system is beyond corrupt.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The felon king is completely unaccountable. I definitely don’t see this going well.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats are still attacking Mamdani

Some elected politicians with a D by their name are.

And frankly I don't think they'll be in office much longer.

Like, as an American who has been paying attention since the DNC defended Bill lying about getting a BJ from an intern:

This is the most optimistic I've been about the Dem party except for the brief window between Obama winning the 08 election, and then him saying he wouldn't name a DNC chair.

I can go on a big rant with details on why we should be optimistic about the party and the country if you want, but if you're ok with recycling I can link you an old comment.

It's fucking weird to spend this much time defending the DNC, but people need to understand the chair is the DNC. And we've got a really fucking good chair since February, and he is already doing shit.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think there will be a midterm election given all that's happening and the speed this administration is userping power?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep.

And if elections are cancelled, I think enough people move on to the next of the four boxes.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good luck! I personally have a bad feeling but I'm not American, it looks very bad from here.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 1 points 14 hours ago

1/3 can, 1/3 will fight them and the remaining will watch from the sidelines

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

They don't control the DNC anymore

This seems more aspirational than based in reality. There are some fringes that have escaped their clutches, but establishment Democrats are still entrenched in the system.

Shit looks bad for everyone right now, including the wealthy.

You're not thinking wealthy enough. The system works perfectly for anyone who can afford to donate $1m for a pardon or $5m for citizenship.

Which is why the media is pushing people to disengage from politics.

Money is definitely afraid of passion, because it can't be bought.

Don't do what billionaires want you to do, it's never in your favor.

10/10. No notes.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They very much own the DNC. Just look at the reaction to the NYC mayor race.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just look at the reaction to the NYC mayor race

Where?

The only thing I've seen is Martin told some donors that progressives can't win every district...

Which, is obviously true

The example he used was Minnesota where one district wants Illhan Omar and another wants some shitty moderate.

But Martin is going to run national DNC like Minnesota.

  1. Stay out of the primary

  2. Support anyone with a D in the general

It's on voters to get progressives to the general, so vote in the primary and get as many people as you can to do so as well

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh I can find quite a few

When the states governor and the top members of the Democratic Party in congress are refusing to endorse the democratic primary winner, they are the DNC. This is Bernie all over again.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What do they have to do with the DNC?

Like, you understand there's the DNC, and then every state has their own state party, then I'm pretty sure the terrorities have them too

If your point is some people with Ds by their name are pieces of shit and need to be replaced, you're preaching to the choir director buddy.

But Martin is the DNC chair, and he hasn't said a single bad thing about Mamdani that I'm aware of.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

He"s using synecdoche, saying "DNC" when he means "the majority of prominent Democrats." You're speaking specifically about the actual DNC. That's why you're disagreeing even though you're both right.