this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
144 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

71866 readers
4354 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's a good article for people who got so used to the internet permeating everything that they never considered the underlying infrastructure. But it's there, and it can be controled - not just in Iran; though certainly countries like Iran and Russia put more effort into isolating it than others. But it will never be 100% - circumvention will always be possible - and I don't mean VPNs, just other physical/technical means of accessing & distributing the internet and/or other forms of ditributed messaging. As a layman's guess I'd say cell towers might factor into this.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Aren’t most cell tower functions just backhauled to the Internet these days, anyway?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I was wondering the same actually:

Wouldn't hard shutting down the internet shut down mobile communications as well. Of course a soft shutdown would allow for filtering that out. I wonder which one Iran chose.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

Yes, a cell phone tower is basically a Wi-Fi router for a bunch of people because it has a connection to the internet via a fiber cable and then broadcasts that out over local airway spectrum. The exact same thing as your Wi-Fi does except for longer range and higher power and higher locations.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

it is far easier to just shut down local peering center and transit for major providers. far less moving elements to take care of than cell towers, which would not even address the whole problem ("problem" from the government's point of view)

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You misunderestood; I guessed that cell towers could be helpful in circumventing such shutdowns. I edited my previous comment to make that a little clearer.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

oh, then i did misunderstood, but i still don't see what you are suggesting. maybe if you get assigned address you can have some limited p2p communication with nearby people, but if that is the case, a guy with a megaphone does similar job.

[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Internet via sattelite is now a thing

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

indeed it is. it is not very relevant to our discussion though. it is not a "cell tower" and it needs rather expensive end user hardware. limit of proliferation of such hardware among population during some kind of government internet shutdown will be approaching to zero.

also, as any kind of radio communication, it can be locally jammed, which further reduces its usability in a crisis.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

our discussion

Not our. It's a discussion you are trying to have with me about something I labeled as a layman's guess.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 0 points 8 hours ago

Not our.

i talk, and you talk. it is our discussion.

It’s a discussion you are trying to have

i am not trying to have, i am having it. here you are, replying to me. why are you trying so hard to prove that a discussion is not a discussion? it does not make sense.

I labeled as a layman’s guess.

yeah. and since i am more knowledgeable than you in this particular regard, i contributed some information you might not have had. now you do and your future layman's guess can be more educated. that is how the discussion works. and for some strange reason, you seem to be pissed about it.