this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
737 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

71866 readers
4387 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds have apparently never met in person before, despite their pseudo-rivalry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's still giving money away though? Why would you want there to be taxes on charity?

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's more nuanced though. Here's how rich people use charities to gain wealth:

Rich person has tons of money that would be taxed if bill Y passes. Rich person creates a charity and donated 20% of what they would had to pay to the IRS to the charity, with that money the charity uses half for good causes and half is given to X lobby company, which then lobbies politicians to avoid passing that bill.

In the end, the rich person saved 80% of what they would had to pay.

Yeah, 10% went to good causes but imagine what the society could afford if 100% went through instead of 0.

This is a very rough outline of how they do it, but the summary is that they use charities to donate to lobbies while skipping taxes on the donation itself.

[–] binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, 10% went to good causes but imagine what the society could afford if 100% went through instead of 0.

It's the US, so more weapons I presume.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

That's the sentiment that allows these rich fucks to avoid paying taxes without big backlash. First focus on collecting, then on spending...

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The point here is that in many jurisdictions doing charity exempts you from certain taxes, and it is possible to shuffle money around under the disguise of philanthropy while still getting all the financial benefits like an actual charity

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Well that's disgusting, ain't it. 🫤

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Giving away money? You sweet summer child.

Research don't want "his" (the foundations) money, it comes with so many strings attached all your lives work now belongs to the B&M foundation.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

You sweet summer child.

Alright dude, I don't know much about the foundation, sorry. 🤷‍♂️