this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
25 points (90.3% liked)

Canada

8817 readers
1873 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The plan notably excludes involvement from VIA Rail, Canada’s only company with experience running a national daily passenger rail service.

Alto is officially known as VIA HFR – VIA TGF Inc., and their website says,

VIA Rail provides advice on the technical and operational aspects of existing passenger railway services.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So does that directly contradict the article or is it a semantical difference that doesn't detract from its thesis?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 4 points 22 hours ago

It certainly seems to contradict the notion that VIA has no involvement - in fact, as near as I can tell, Alto is still a VIA subsidiary. But maybe that's wrong, it's a little unclear.

I don't think it necessarily invalidates the idea of it being a "fast track to privatization," or that ticket prices will be high.