this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
1198 points (98.6% liked)

memes

15556 readers
3142 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It lacks predictability and reproduceability. At least to a certain extend. As long as every diagnosis is "this most likely is" or even "could be", it is not science.

But you can still look down on economists, who are somewhere between crystal ball readers or tea leaf interpreters and random number generators on that behalf.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Economists aren't trying to predict the future. That's a misconception that is done away with in the first few days of intro.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Economists set option prices. That is literally trying to predict the future.

Edit: To be fair, I shouldn't say "economists" in general. There are plenty of good economists out there that understand that economics is not a predictive science, I know a couple personally. But there are definitely some economists out there that think their degree lets them predict the unpredictable.