this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
542 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

71371 readers
3484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
542
AOSP isn't dead, but Google just landed a huge blow to custom ROM developers (www.androidauthority.com)
submitted 2 days ago by lzfm@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TL;DR

  • Google has made it harder to build custom Android ROMs for Pixel phones by omitting their device trees and driver binaries from the latest AOSP release.

  • The company says this is because it’s shifting its AOSP reference target from Pixel hardware to a virtual device called “Cuttlefish” to be more neutral.

  • While Google insists AOSP isn’t going away, developers must now reverse-engineer changes, making the process for supporting Pixel devices more difficult.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quik@infosec.pub 86 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Now more than ever we need more work on PostmarketOS, Mobian, Gnome Mobile etc...

Bummer that it's still so hard to find a somewhat modern, affordable phone that is Linux compatible

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I'd totally buy a phone running one of those provided it does all the phone things properly: SMS/MMS, reliable calls, all day battery, etc. I don't need fancy apps, I just need a working phone.

If I can get that, I could probably donate some time porting apps.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I really want to give furios phone a shot. It's apparently close to supporting my carrier.

That and a sailfish phone. The community one though didn't support my carrier (think it's mainly EU specced only.)

What I find missing most of the time though is any esim support. Makes me wonder if the hardware one that you can program an esim on works.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

I plan on buying one when my current phone is no longer usable.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why eSim? Does your carrier not support physical sim?

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

For traveling I find it much easier to just buy an esim

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

It's so crazy (technically understandable, but still crazy) to me that reliably receiving calls is still such a major issue

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

I know someone at a company that built and sold a Linux phone 19 years ago.

You're not upset you can't find a Linux phone: you're upset you can't find one anymore.