this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
1197 points (98.6% liked)

memes

15556 readers
3453 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The number of hypotheses we've proven, mostly. Also, we have this whole field of non-Euclidean geometry. And the modern Pythagoreans are a lot more chill about people knowing the irrationality of Pi.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but I mean revision not additive change. From what I remember nothing in elements is wrong. I don't think anyone proved that last postulate

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Nothing is wrong, it's just more incomplete than a modern book.

But if you're at the 101 level, sure. It works fine.