xyzzy

joined 2 years ago
[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 97 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And they would vote for him again.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The Democratic Party is not a serious party. Both the party elite and the die-hard supporters need to wake the fuck up.

Days after President Donald Trump took office for the second time, a boatload of candidates vying to lead the Democratic National Committee crammed into a Washington auditorium plastered with MSNBC logos.

This was their last big forum before the vote to make the case that they had what it took to rescue their party from irrelevance.

The moderators called on a little-known contender, Quintessa Hathaway, to deliver the first opening statement. “I just want to give you all a little bit of something that’s been on my heart,” she told the audience.

Then, suddenly, unexpectedly, she broke into song. “When your government is doing you wrong,” she belted out, “you fight on, oh-oh, you fight on.”

It had only taken four minutes for the battle over the future of the Democratic Party to devolve into what critics likened to a scene from Portlandia, a comedy satirizing ultra-liberals — and it was a punchline that was clipped and replayed across social media in the days ahead. Things only got more surreal, and viral, from there. [...]

“How many of you believe that racism and misogyny played a role in Vice President Harris’ defeat?” asked MSNBC anchor Jonathan Capehart. Every candidate raised their hand. “That’s good,” he added. “You all pass.” Later, a DNC member asked, in reference to party positions: “Will you pledge to appoint more than one transgender person to an at-large seat?” Only one of eight contenders kept their hand down. [...]

In multiple surveys since the election, a plurality of Democratic voters has said that Harris should be the 2028 presidential nominee. [...]

Progressives calling for a more leftward tack on economics haven’t gotten a much better reception. Faiz Shakir, the former campaign manager for Bernie Sanders’ 2020 bid, has said that Democrats should adopt a muscular economic populist agenda to win back working-class voters. When he ran for DNC chair on that platform, he only won two votes. [...]

David Shor, an influential liberal pollster, has been circulating a presentation to Democrats dissecting the 2024 election. Slide after slide paints a dire picture for the party: Young voters have become more Republican. Trump likely won foreign-born voters. The electorate trusts the GOP more than Democrats on Social Security. Higher turnout wouldn’t have saved Harris; in fact, it would have made Trump win by a larger margin. [...]

But intraparty critics said Democrats’ near-certain belief that they are going to take back the House in the midterms is also enabling them to continue avoiding hard conversations and perhaps obscuring the need to have a reckoning. There’s still a pervasive sense among some in the party that they don’t need to bother with all that — the pendulum will swing their way regardless.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Spend some time in the NY Times comment section and you'll find these voters. They are convinced that "centrist" policies are the way to win elections and they detest Bernie Sanders and anyone who voted for him. They still blame "Bernie bros" for Trump's win in 2016. They think the only thing wrong with Harris's campaign was that she didn't have enough time to get her message out. They basically want some of the same goals as Republicans around immigration and anti-"woke," they just want them done in a nicer way that doesn't hurt any feelings. No one will admit it, but I suspect most of them voted for Reagan.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 83 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I dare say I'm beginning to suspect this Trump fellow may not be as competent as he claims

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You forgot

\4. This so-called reporter with a long history of hoaxes faked this entire story.

At least they tried that line before giving up when not even most of their party believed them.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Ah yes, solving the actual problem by changing your username.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

We need to root out this rot

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I'm paranoid, turn off location services for nearly all apps, frozen credit, locked down bank account, friends only everywhere... and I missed this. Useful public service announcement by Wired.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Voting on what? Everything is being done through executive actions. This Congress has rendered itself irrelevant. The only thing Congress is actually doing is voting on nominees, and I think Democrats should vote against those, but they're too busy unanimously voting in favor of them.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

What's hard to understand? Republicans control the House, and Republicans are complicit. Any impeachment charge wouldn't make it out of committee, and any charge on the floor would be quickly voted down.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wisconsin completed an audit recently and published the results: no errors.

https://apnews.com/article/wisconsin-election-audit-trump-biden-2024-68d666a3e30ec4a904b1b6e33be311a6

Some articles that people post about Trump drop-off votes (where they only vote for Trump) being somehow suspicious are kind of stupid. Is it really hard to believe that many of his otherwise politically-disengaged cult members vote for him and then go home? Or that Democrats were not super enthusiastic about Harris's moderate conservative campaign?

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Here's why it might seem odd: https://youtube.com/shorts/Q2CGJRfgDQ0

Color normally comes before qualifiers like "Republican," but in this case "black woman" is used as a noun phrase that is being modified by Republican.

view more: ‹ prev next ›