thatonecoder

joined 1 year ago
[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

You may be saying “we've known this all along”, but remember: this is Portugal's top diplomat; it takes a lot of guts to say this, considering that Trump is especially vindictive. Also, Marcelo has already won a handshake battle (video in Portuguese) against Trump in 2017, LOL.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh my god… This is one of the best blogs I have EVER seen. I added it to my RSS feed right after reading that post.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If there is an emergency the school refuses to report (or worse; them creating a situation), that is not the case.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

If the internet disappears or you lose access to it for some reason, you can still see your photos.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

They own assets. Take away those assets, they lose their “leverage”.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

@grue@lemmy.world 's explanation is spot on. However, just to practice summaries, I'll write anyway.

Here are a few terms I'll use:

  • Project A
  • Project B

The GPL family of licenses are all copyleft. This means that any code used from Project A in Project B, for instance, makes the latter have the same license, along with not being able to make either Project A or B proprietary*. Furthermore, with copyleft licensed software, you have to give the corresponding source code, along with the compiled binary.

The difference between the v2 and v3 versions of GPL is that, with the former, Tivoization was possible. Tivoization makes you only able to use the “official” version of the software, rendering it proprietary. Now, here is the comparison between the GPL variants:

  • GPL: The first of the kind, not much to say here.
  • LGPL: It allows you to link (as in libraries) code from Project A to B, without making Project B use the license, too
  • AGPL: You've certainly heard of SaaS, which allows you to serve websites licensed under the GPL, for example, without giving the corresponding source code. The AGPL solves this.

*That is, if there are more contributors to Project A that have not given up their authorship. Also, the version of Project A that used the GPLv3 before can still be used under the same license.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, I know. But, while trying to find a way to bomb the AI datacenters (/s, hopefully it doesn't come to this), we can stall their attacks.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

I would have a plan, but it would be against the rules of this community, instance, my instance, and any Lemmy instance, the Fediverse in general, social media, and, overall, the internet.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yep! That was exactly the protocol on my mind. One thing, though, is that the Fediverse would need to be ported to Gemini, or at least for a new protocol to be created for Gemini.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I know this is the most ridiculous idea, but we need to pack our bags and make a new internet protocol, to separate us from the rest, at least for a while. Either way, most “modern” internet things (looking at you, JavaScript) are not modern at all, and starting over might help more than any of us could imagine.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

I'd say you need to be at least a bit concerned, especially considering long COVID, which can be dangerous. This is why I still wear an FFP2/N95 mask, even though everyone claims that COVID is gone. I recommend doing all you can to improve your health, going as far as a healthy diet and meditation. Just do anything you can that makes both of y'all recover fully ASAP.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, but a temporary mirror would still be great.

view more: ‹ prev next ›