proletarians_must_suffer

joined 1 week ago
[–] proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can exploited proletarians choose to start revolution and stop being exploited, or not? If yes, they have freedom of choice and being exploited is their choice, If not, then proletarian revolution is impossible.

[–] proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Where?

In some interview or article, I believe.

They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?

So unless someone achieves communism, they're not a communist? Btw, since 3rd Reich didn't follow all nazi tenants and didn't achieve all nazi goals, maybe they weren't nazis?

Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn’t agree with him in some manner or the other

Hitler

Sorry, but you've set up this perfect punchline yourself.

Please, enlighten me

Oh, so you don't know what my views are, but have already concluded they're absurd. Well, jokes on you, I'm an anarcho communist (no)

[–] proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Tell me you just did a quick google without telling me

Tell me you did a quick Google without telling me

And the CNT/FAI?

Dunno wtf this is, but I bet another bunch of bourgeoisie

You said yourself that you think nazis are left-wing.

You said my worldview is internally inconsistent. Nazis being left wing contradicts some of my other beliefs? Or is it that my worldview contradicts your cringe communist worldview? Well, fuck your worldview then. You're wrong and I'm right.

[–] proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The thing about class war is that one class takes the freedom to chose away from the other class.

Oh really? But that would mean that proletarian revolution is impossible since proletarians can't choose to conduct it, bc they have no freedom to choose. I wonder what Marx thinks about that.

[–] proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world -4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere

I didn't say it. Although he did.

You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing.

Where?

Btw are bolsheviks communists? Bc they clearly stated they are. No need to even read between the lines.

And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour

And what's the relation between capitalism and slavery?

Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?

The point is that socialists can be socialists without applying Marx works in any way.

You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview

What worldview? What is my worldview?

[–] proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (5 children)

They literally said that while people are born into a class, they decide their future and whether to stay in that class. I literally quoted it word for word.

[–] proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (5 children)

No. They were state-capitalists.

Ok.

You agree that companies made profits. That’s a capitalist policy.

Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years. Not everything can be implemented immediately.

All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially

Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?

You’re enough of an ancap

What is that even supposed to mean?

[–] proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I’m not here to defend bourgeois revolutions

Ah, so you're a communist with the real-communism-was-never-tried flavor. Ok then.

Explain how e.g. Nestor Makhno or the CNT/FAI “exterminated” the bourgeoisie.

What about him? He was bourgeoisie himself, participating in bourgeoisie revolution. He's irrelevant to the question.

Yeah. I figured that you didn’t have an internally consistent worldview.

Where's the inconsistency?

view more: next ›