To your surprise, i can't agree more! You should never omit the fact: questioning whether the civilians were the target or gruesome collateral victims (or "martyrs").
This fact is what tells the difference in our views, unfortunately. This hurts me as bad, as you, i guess.
Qudsnen.co: "Quds News Network (QNN) is the largest independent and comprehensive Palestinian youth electronic news network."
I wish people would provide at least this brief information on the "sources" they link to. This really helps to assess the credibility and objectivity.
How dare you?!
/S
"If someone eggs your house"
This is NOT what happened, you must be trolling or delusional.
So... What are your suggestions for actions that are not disproportionate?! I have none, which would be adequate against the intentional atrocities by hamas and other paramilitaries.
Calling other people (all the more, a nation as a whole) names - is not critical thinking.
Presenting biased rhethorics (all the more, not in a neutral manner, but emotionally loaded claims) and ommitting any contradicting points - has nothing to do with critical thinking.
Opinions vs facts. One-sided accusing vs rational thinking. 💁
Would you share your preferred alternative(s), if any? Thanks! 🖐️
Is that your next suggestion, omg: "Let them wear special distinguishing marks on their clothes too. Like, some kind of a star sign"?!
/S
That's seriously creepy, dude.