Yes indeed! In my mind civilization and hierarchy overlap perfectly, am I mistaken? Care to hand me some examples where that is not the case?
myrmidex
It wasn't meant to come over as cynical. I just wanted to indicate how this is not exclusive to these times. Before the modern age, there were already a lot of powerful people doing a lot of heinous things. I just wonder when the finger will start pointing, not at those in power, but at power itself.
a.k.a. the history of civilization
Nice, thanks for that! Bonus points for using DockGE, I prefer that over portainer as well!
I saw this item pass by on the local news the other day, including an interview with Versluys, and I don't recall any of them mentioning the exports bound for Ukraine. Looking at the article from a few days back, that doesn't mention it either. Just saying, there's a good chance the protesters did not intend to impact Ukraine.
Appreciate the insight! I vaguely recall hearing that before, but it seems to have been drowned out by AI’s rising popularity and omnipresence.
Dude, Walter, Donnie and the Jesus from The Big Lebowski. Whenever I see Turturro play any other role, he's so bland and normal.
Is Claude blackmailing Anthropic into releasing this news? Seems weird that a company would be so honest about this.
You need the state to optimize sharing of resources
I don't believe this to be true. There were no states in the earliest of tribes, yet they survived:
early human societies managed resources through communal efforts and mutual agreements without the need for a centralized authority. These tribes relied on shared cultural norms and direct cooperation among members to allocate and utilize resources effectively. The absence of a formal state did not prevent them from thriving. Instead, it fostered a sense of collective responsibility and interdependence. This demonstrates that resource sharing can be successfully managed through decentralized and community-driven approaches, challenging the notion that a state is essential for optimizing resource distribution.
you get smaller and smaller tribal groups competing
Over scarce resources - yes that is a plausible scenario indeed. That's why a plan is essential in order for people to be able to believe in such an undertaking. The groups will need to federate on the level of neighborhoods, towns, cities, states, nationals, and eventually, the planet. If attained, that's all the protection they'll need. But granted, that's a big if.
Not really sure why, but the title reminded me of this Frankie Boyle joke:
American foreign policy is horrendous 'cause not only will America come to your country and kill all your people, but what's worse, I think, is that they'll come back 20 years later and make a movie about how killing your people made their soldiers feel sad.
Currently reading: James Acaster's Classic Scrapes. A funny collection of stories from his childhood, an enjoyable read. I'd recommend it if you're looking for something light and funny.
Before this, I gave up on the book All Our Wrong Todays by Elan Mastai, after about a hundred pages. I just couldn't get into it, the story kept halting in favor of flashbacks and setting the MC's backstory. I hate stories not starting soon enough with the actual story. Unnecessary to say, but I would not recommend this :)