This infighting seems unproductive and frankly a waste of time.
as opposed to what pressing matters the community has on our plate?
jerkface
joined 2 years ago
If we sprinkle them, liberally, it will make up, for it.
Man, try using the Internet after 40. EVERYTHING is a stupid in-joke with no explanation. It would be a full time job if I started complaining about it.
This chart represents the abuse and murder of billions of vulnerable individuals.
I don't think "programmer" fully captures the reality of being an emacs-based programmer.
Iron? I suspect otherwise... My dear RHNB, I miss your red hot nickel ball.
Markov chains are both probabilistic and data-driven. For example. LLMs are not that far removed from markov chains. Should game developers be allowed to use latent spaces or is that too sloppy AI?
I think you are reading in the "designed by humans" part. Even when that is nominally true, the whole point of procedural generation is to create a level of complexity and emergence that the outputs are surprising and novel. Things no one expected are desirable. I think the distinction being drawn is not meaningful; in both cases, it is entirely possible and likely that no human being understands how a given output was arrived at.
If you'd had an opinion that was relevant to the question, you would have understood the question. This thread was not for you, and I see no advantage to make it more accessible to someone with nothing to contribute. It's fun to "get it" and if you don't get it, dumbing down the reference isn't going to make it fun for you, it's just going to make it less fun for others.
It's like complaining that people always use the word "address" to describe IP endpoints. THAT'S THE WORD FOR IT. When you say "slop" people know you mean AI generated content; when you say "garbage", they don't.
The difference between "generative AI" and "procedural generation" cannot be meaningfully nailed down.
Why would they invade when they can just embargo. We couldn't get anything in or out if they said no.