ggppjj

joined 2 years ago
[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And steamed carrots slap.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're perfect for each other.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

INSPIRED

bythatsamefrenchexcellence

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

muah hua haaaaa

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's very distinct. I wouldn't call it vomit, but it's a lingering chemical-ey taste.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I think I have a mutation in a taste bud or something, but Sucralose is really a prominent and nasty taste to me in anything it's in. Really frustrating to taste it in otherwise sugary drinks, like some of the Monster flavors.

For reference, I also think cilantro tastes like soap. No clue if that's an indicator or not.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

There's a base default, for games that don't have a valve default. Devs can also set a default themselves IIRC which is essentially the same as a valve default for the purposes of this conversation. The original implementation did not automatically allow all games without a valve default to be run, something that there's still a setting for which is now default on. The override option overrides either the valve default if there is one or the base default if both the option to allow games without valve defaults is on and there is no valve default.

So if you override a game that does have a valve default and then remove the override, it'll use the valve default whatever that happens to be at the time.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I really don't understand the aggression, I was talking about the old rich dead people propaganda concerning no taxation without representation 200 years ago, I never said anything about the fuckwads we have today.

If you think I'm saying something different, explain what you read and allow me the opportunity to clarify my intent.

Saying I'm full of shit at this point is just asinine.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't know, I don't see anyone saying that here.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (21 children)

That's possibly reframing "no taxation without representation" a bit but I don't entirely disagree with the sentiment.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

They're cops, you've put more thought into it than they did.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I don't enjoy the idea of babies given circumcisions, I can't abide genetic tailoring by a person internationally decried as an unethical practitioner doing things in secret just to stoke his ego to make him the first, bypassing the incredibly necessary ethical safeguards that the industry enforces against themselves.

I don't want him to be able to do what he did in the way that he did it because the way that he did what he did allows for monstrosities to be committed in the name of advancing science at any cost with no thought to potential lifelong unknowable direct consequences in the people being treated.

I don't have an anti-genetic editing slant, I don't think the goal is bad.

view more: next ›