eldebryn

joined 3 days ago
[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

That's basically saying that "big tech" (as we know it today) and competition-friendly capitalism just cannot coexist. Which I'm inclined to agree with.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago

this is a photo not a link...

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago (3 children)

the entire UK government disliked this comment

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What I'm saying is that a more reasonable stance is to say "package as-is or fork it if you want I will put 0 effort to accomodate".

Others have clarified that they are not as extreme as I thought though so maybe that's fine.

I just think that from a perspective this seems like a "people in X country keep writing gay fanfic about my book and asking if A and B characters are gay. so I'm gonna stop selling there and also destroy All copies left in their language. Because I'm a petty man-child".

But, once again, I hope this is not what's actually happening here and my reading was off.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 93 points 2 days ago (25 children)

While users can be demanding, this reads like a very immature response. Going out of your way to block support and prohibit packaging, which you can let others do with 0 seconds of your time, is kinda rude.

Author may have been harassed for all I know, but this is still an emotional response. They could have just said "yeah I'm not supporting this at all, figure it out yourselves if you want to" rather than actively blocking Linux functionality/packaging, which is what this sounds like.