data1701d

joined 2 years ago
[–] data1701d@startrek.website 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I think this is why we need more animated Star Trek. While no recent animated Trek show has really managed to get past the equivalent total runtime to a ~5 season, 10 50-minute episode Trek series, I think animation could be a medium to get past some of the budgetary and labor limitations of a live action show in order to return to something closer to a TNG-style season. Not only that, but you could have the cast doing and interacting with things that would simply be impossible to do with any quality in a live-action show.

Although truth be told, I think half my opinion is just fueled by sourness over the end of Lower Decks and Prodigy. I really think though that animation could be the medium for a serious mainline Star Trek series that isn't (originally intended as) an excursion into a genre. Unfortunately, we sort of live in an animation dark age because of executive and general stupidity.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 13 points 3 months ago

I enjoyed this episode much more than the previous one. It was quite fun. Sure, holodeck episodes aren't the most original idea in Star Trek, but they're almost always good, and I think this episode was worth the slight fudging of canon.

Also, seeing the "Last Frontier" bits and how well they captured the TOS feel makes me think, "Why do they need to make modern Trek so fancy? Why can't we have cheap-looking sets again?" Also, I think this is one of the better Paul Wesley performances in this show.

I was relieved to find they didn't go to far with the meta this episode. So many of the clips and dialogues of this episode I saw in the initial trailers made me worry this season was going to do a multiverse plot or venture a bit too far beyond the fourth wall.

The only thing is the Spock/La'an romance is driving me nuts. Neither is emotionally ready, and Spock STILL has a fiance. It's painful to watch it knowing that it's almost certainly doomed. I don't necessarily mind them acknowledging that they have feelings to each other, but I would have thought there would be a mutual desire to keep it platonic. In the end though, at least dancing isn't Vulcan neuropressure - as I get further into Enterprise, I kind of wonder how Rick Berman has evaded the trunk of my car for so long.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Here’s my go at it:

collapsed inline mediaPerseverance-class Starship, 45 degree view

collapsed inline mediaFront of ship

My rationale is this is an Intrepid-based Miranda replacement attempt. The boom below the nacelles can be configured for extra weapons, sensors, or even as nacelles to allow an improved warp geometry for towing vessels below the ship (although good for towing, the ship has overall slower max speeds this way). They can also just be straight-up removed, the fastest configuration for the ship, as it get rid of the structural integrity field requirements for the boom.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All Starfleet warp cores built 2378 and later secretly use a constantly tortured transporter clone of Chief O’Brien in order to improve dilithium usage efficiency by 76%.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

True! I guess I don’t mean that many implementations are inherently bad.

I guess the web browser analogy brings up the point that even though there’s many major behavioral differences between Wayland implementations right now that can make life a bit miserable, there’s hope that standardization could improve and make it easier to make sure applications work anywhere. I’m just a little sad a lot of important thinks weren’t standardized from the beginning/

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I mean, at least systemd is one(-ish) program with one API that everyone can target like xorg. There's so many different Wayland implementations that it gets rather mind-boggling.

Of course, I don't hate Wayland - I just currently use XFCE. If XFCE ever switches, I'll go along with it. If applications end xorg support before XFCe switches(or if XFCE becomes unmaintained), I'll consider jumping ship to something that uses Wayland.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

But supposedly, as said in the show, the house could regain their honor by someone in the house assassinating Dak’Rah, so I don’t get how using technicalities to graft M’Benga would violate that rule.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 9 points 3 months ago

Relax, Doc. It's just a bit of lin alg!

collapsed inline mediaEvil Doctor Left multiplied by regular Doctor equals the identity matrix

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Did anyone else think, "Why doesn't Bytha just pull a House Quark and marry, then immediately divorce M'Benga?"

Although I guess M'Benga, unlike Quark, can't pull the "This isn't an honorable combat. This is an execution!"

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeh. Really, I hope this takes full advantage of the 31st century setting, because I feel like there's so much to explore, even in existing Star Trek societies.

While some might see the Klingons here as beating a dead horse, I really have wanted to know how the Klingons handled the burn. I hope it's not something dumb like, "My race turned to civil war."

I think it would be kind of awesome if instead, we had the homeworld Klingons have a cultural shift where they choose to avoid civil war and instead embrace unprecedented collaboration in the hopes of one day attaining their former glory. Of course, this doesn't mean they quit being warriors; my thought is to keep their teeth sharp, there is a gladiator set up using holodeck and transporter technology where two combatants enter. Then, the computer randomly selects, with the result unknown to the combatants, whether it merely streams the combatant's presence to each other and prevents lethal blows or actually puts the combatants in a duel to the death (about a 1/20 chance).

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago

Um, actchooally, Descendants predates Disney Plus by a few years.

collapsed inline mediaLaugh

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm sad about the TAS episode not being a thing, I'm sad about the puppets being muppets instead of practical creatures, but also, this episode just seems like fun.

It almost reminds me of the Christmas episode of Eureka that was really fun, but may have single-handedly brought the series overbudget. That show was fun, with some flaws:

  • Some of the worst autism representation I have seen on television.
  • It could never decide if it was a comedy or a drama, although that wishy-washiness sometimes worked in its favor, such as when they decided to stir up the plot by creating an alternate timeline... twice.
view more: ‹ prev next ›