Umbrias

there are lots of things that pharma companies do which are abusive, but the existence of treatments is rarely one of them. Herbal medicine is cool but inconsistent, relying on inconsistent medicinal dosing will kill people. Other comments point out the question is more "how to do industry" than anything else. And no 99.9% of medicine disappearing will in fact kill people.

This is not something you want to speculate on, the point is that in an anarchist society, biochemical engineers, doctors, researchers, would be figuring out methods to make and produce useful medicine. Dont go all primitivist on it because it's a complex problem that capitalism leeches from parasitically.

no you see they're right, sufficiently simple is just a fancy way of saying the trivial answer of "doesnt exist"

why do you care that someone didnt say it was worse enough? "x is a problem, if y is true then z is a problem" -> "why didnt you talk about x"

silly.

Because these are often sold with profile building features, for example, recall. Recall is sold as "local only" with profile building features. So it continues to be centralized pii that is a point of failure. As the quote says, as i said.

I don’t care if your language model is “local-only” and runs on the user’s device. If it can build a profile of the user (regardless of accuracy) through their smartphone usage, that can and will be used against people.

emphasis mine from the text you quoted…

building and centralizing pii is indeed a privacy point of failure. what's not to understand?

you dont fight for what is, but for what can be.

i see, the computer version of a prehensile tail…

if you give up before they even start then you lose without trying, and then they will still find ways to arrest you.

no, i mean theoretically who knows, but practically no. compressing something to be more dense than a solid is energy intense. you are surpassing the bond energy of moleculesto do it. second, compressing enough osmium is going to take less, but still bigajoules, of energy. the compressive stress is immense. anything that could hold thht stress is much too big to fit in the package.

am i the only one who notices that this logic makes no sense? it doesnt matter that they have no lungs, they still are susceptible to both heat and airborn toxins, they perform gas exchange. They lived because the heat and smoke were below lethal toxic levels for them.

that's not really relevant to the question at hand. "but magic" is clearly not an interesting answer when people are playing around with physics.