Tinidril

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

That group is infuriating. The worst are the ones that drag Democratic primaries to the right, then vote Republican anyways.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Cuomo was projected to be ahead after the first round. The election was going to be a question of whether or not Mamdani's certain gains in subsequent rounds would be enough to catch up. Mamdani being so far ahead after the first round meant Cuomo was done.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

The people you are talking about about will never remove their cranial bowel obstructions, but their twisted forms can be removed from the Democratic party by voters.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

but to keep the brown natural-born citizens who voted for him from realizing

Um, what? He has better support from wealthy whites than from racial minorities.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You are way understating his odds at winning the general.

Your implicit argument that so-called "centrist" Democrats are better at winning purple states because voters all exist along a simple left to right spectrum is absolutely wrong. The people in this country are fed up and they want revolution. Republicans offered it, and Democrats didn't. The rightward lurch was just an artifact of people rationalizing their vote and conforming to the stereotype on offer.

One big excuse the Democratic establishment gave was that the world is in an anti-incombancy mood. That's a correct observation, but what is really happening is the death of neoliberalism everywhere. The one big outlier to the trend was Mexico where an aging male President successfully handed the reigns over to his protege, a younger woman. The difference is, they were progressives. Mexico is also arguably a more religiously conservative country than America.

The wonky framing of the US electorate has been the standard Democratic perspective for decades. It's what led to the income inequality we have now. It's what led to Trump, and the complete routing of Democrats in both federal and state governments. For the love of God, wake up already.

The Democrats don't win because they aren't real people, they are characters on TV that people are sick of. Neoliberalism drains the blood and passion that people want to see in leadership. Republicans have it, and Democrats don't. It's past time that changed.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't say they blamed Iran, but concerned is concerned and it's pretty damn easy to Google. I'm not crying, I'm not supporting US actions, I'm not saying Iran is the devil. None of this has been part of this conversation until now, it's just the argument you want to have, and I'm not interested.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nobody told the US how to do it or handed them a design. They did do a test, but it worked on the very first try. All Iran would have to do is do as well as America did and, despite what you think, knowledge of how to make it is readily available.

The hardest part are the extremely high tolerance detonators. They can test those in secret all day long. That's where 75 years of progress in engineering makes the job a whole lot easier too. Modern electronics will also make it a lot easier for them to know when they get it right, without having to set off a nuke.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The IAEA agrees with me. They are very concerned that Iran has almost certainly moved their 60% stock to an undisclosed location.

60% is still a long ways off from making a bomb, but there is also no reason to get it that far except to go further.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Do you think the physics of nukes is widely shared, accurately?

What nukes? They aren't all the same, and plain old fission bombs are not actually that complicated. Iran is also an ally of Russia and North Korea, both of which have been in the nuclear club for quite some time now. Fusion bombs are a hell of a lot more complicated. Getting optimum yields from either is complicated. There are no secrets at this point about how to make a minimally functional (as used in Japan) fission bomb.

And as far as MAD... Do you think Israel has ever been inspected?

Israel doesn't even admit to having them. They don't need them for MAD. Israel's promise of overwhelming retaliation comes from it's alliance with the US. They have nukes because they want the option. If the US ever abandoned Israel, I guarantee they would let the world know they have them, and they would do a test, or they would have someone inspect them, just like every other nuclear power did before using them as a deterrent.

Right now, the intelligence community doesn't think they're close to a bomb. If that opinion were reversed, that's just as good as having a bomb.

Or it's an invitation to be bombed and/or invaded before they get there.

view more: ‹ prev next ›