That sounds like some diversity language to me.
SeaJ
Two consecutive quarters and that is a very open definition since other factors also are considered.
Odd (not at all) that Russia is not included. I know that we lot do about $3.5 billion in trade with them but some places that we hit with tariffs are not even inhabited.
The dude majored in economics and very clearly does not understand how a trade deficit works.
It is kind of seeming like this. Anyone who has a ton of cash on hand can get amazing deals on assets. Trump has said as much.
That was with very clear money laundering too.
So they can't reference the Clean Water Act?
Cool. Can we see how many were deleted?
Correct.
As of Jan 2025, X (formerly Twitter) had around 335.7 million users, so how is it possible that data from 2.8 billion users has been leaked? One possible explanation is that the dataset includes aggregated or historical data, such as bot accounts that were created and later banned, inactive or deleted accounts that still lingered in historical records, or old data that was merged with newer data, increasing the total number of records.
He essentially did the same thing with Solar City a decade ago. Although that was "owned" by his cousins and he bailed them out with by buying it for a few billion.
He can't even justify to himself that Twitter is worth the $44 billion he (and investors) paid for it.
Rich kids get gentleman Cs like GWB did at Yale. There was no possibility that he wasn't going to pass.