SayJess

joined 2 years ago
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, if they did revoke your ability to have a license in OK with the proper gender marker on it, it’s to protect children.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

You’re absolutely right!

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

This is why a new war is needed. Once they are unable to afford to disappear people en masse, they’ll need a new distraction. Just jingle some keys in front of them as you pick their pockets of rights and dignity, and they’ll be satisfied.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

“The Legislature has made it abundantly clear that sexually explicit performances have no place in public spaces, especially in front of children,” Daniels said. “Unfortunately, drag shows continue to spark controversy in Bartlesville and across the state, underscoring the need for further legal guidance.”

Hold up. Wait a minute. I thought that law was about keeping children safe from sexual stuff in public. Who could have possibly thought that they would conflate drag performances with sexually deviant acts, that must be outlawed in order to protect children. That is absolutely not what the law was intended for, right?

Bringing back obscenity laws surely won’t be used to criminalize wearing clothes that do not align with someone’s assigned sex at birth, right? Putting the now illegal trans people in prisons that correspond to a persons sex assigned at birth is not a threat to their safety, right? I thought it was about protecting women?? Stopping their access to hormone therapy, mental health services, and proper clothing while imprisoned surely is not a punishment for being an illegal person, right?

Banning trans health care for minors is only about protecting children as well, right? Surely they will not use that as a basis to prohibit trans health care for all trans people, right?

There’s no way any of this could be about erasing, and eventually cleansing, a minority population, right?

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 week ago (4 children)

As mentioned in the article, they will invoke emergency powers to gain access to more money. The Big Beautiful Bill would give them everything they need as well.

They’ll print the money to fund their cleansing until it’s value is nothing, and their supporters will cheer them on into ruin.

They’ve only just begun their campaign of terror on the populace. They still have several other groups of minorities they need to take care of. The whole “First they came for…” is playing out right before our eyes.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Damnit! Foiled once again!

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I wish d**** upon everyone involved in the process. Is that censored enough? It could mean so many 5 letter words that begin with ‘d’.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s what I fear most and have been saying loudly to anyone who will listen, but they are all indifferent.

If I lose access to my care, I don’t know what I will do.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

They abandoned us a while ago now.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Did they somehow work in “transgender for everybody” into the assassinations yet? I haven’t been following too closely.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago

A censure? We’d be lucky if he doesn’t get celebrated for it.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It would take nothing, because I would not accept them back as a partner. I’d rather not find out if “once a cheater, always a cheater” holds true or not.

You need to move on and work on yourself. He’s always going to doubt you to at least some degree. Don’t put him through that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›