Raiderkev

joined 2 years ago
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A friend of mine's kid snitched on him when he was in the right. Something similar where 5 and under were free or discounted, and he said to the ticket person she's 5, and she just decided to play a kid game with him. "NOOO DADDDY, I'M 6!" but she actually was 5. He said, no, you're not sweetheart you're 5, and the lady gives him a wink and goes "It's ok, she can be 5 today." He was trying to tell her she actually was 5 and he wasn't trying to cheat them, and she's like "don't worry about it" in a tone that said she was not believing him.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

He is (or was) the richest man in the world. You'd have to be living under a rock to not know who he is

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

"There's tesla buyers who dont even know who musk is or what he does"

I'm going to have to call bs on that.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

My point from a legal standpoint is that 'fighting words' are not protected speech

https://www.thefire.org/news/80-years-ago-supreme-court-introduced-fighting-words

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

In other news, JD Vance says "What's that?" When asked about the Streisand effect.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like it or not, that's been the interpretation since the founding of the US. It is not the case in some other countries, but I'm assuming we are talking about the US here. What most people miss is it only restricts the government from punishing your speech, not private entities. Insults, defamation, and lies, are absolutely allowed, but you can be found liable civilly for any damage done by this speech either through punitive damages (lawsuit settlement) or other means, deplatforming, loss of employment, etc.

threats, calls for hatred, are a bit of a gray area. It depends on the severity of the threat, but true threats can be prosecuted.

Hate speech is generally allowed, but if it is inciteful enough to be a true threat, it too can be prosecuted.

If you'd like to read up on true threats, see below:

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/icap/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2024/08/True-Threats-Guidance-3.pdf

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, but a liter a day seems a bit excessive for sugar intake.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Honestly, the latter is absolutely free speech. They are 100% free to say that shit if they want. They are not free however from consequences, i.e. getting hit in the mouth, fired from their job, etc.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I know, I used to work at a health food store. It was really blowing up around 2010-2015 or so, but I just don't think it's anywhere near as popular today.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I feel like the coconut water trend died out like 5-10 years ago. I never see anyone drinking it anymore.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I guess we'll have to call him Louie G now.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Happy this guy did this, but don't forget Roger Waters is a piece of shit and supports Russia in this war. Probably fondling Trump's balls at this very moment.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-64580688

view more: next ›