Prunebutt

joined 1 year ago
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but the real world usually revolves around more complicated questions than "do you die from lava?"

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That still only covers a tiny fraction of what is reported. Objectivity in the real world is an illusion.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The joke is that not everything (or almost nothing) that gets reported can be viewed from a lens of "objective truth". Your examples wouldn't be able to give me information of a statement that someone did, or if something happened... anywhere.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I'm still waiting for the bill that states what happened in Nice last week. /j

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 day ago

You can also just download any binary file you find online and run it. Or use any install.sh script you happen to find anywhere.

Package managers are simply a convenient offer to manage packages with their dynamically linked libraries and keep them up to date (important for security). But it's still just an offer.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.cafe/post/13998113

rule

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The alignment problem is already the wrong narrative, as it implies agency where there is none. All that talk about "alignment problem" draws focus from AI ethics (not a term I made up).

Read the article.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Then you highlight why AI Safety is important by linking a blog post about the dangers of poorly thought-out AI systems

Have you read the article? it clearly states the difference of AI safety vs AI ethics and argues why the formerare quacks and the latter is ignored.

If you read AI Safety trolley problems and think they are warning you about an ai god, you misunderstood the purpose of the discussion.

Have you encountered what Sam Altman or Elsevier Yudkowsky claim about AI safety? It's literally "AI might make humanity go extinct" shit.

The fear mongering Sam Altman is doing is a sales tactic. That's the hypeman part.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I know of him and I enjoy his videos.

Still, fearmongering for a god AI that might kill us all is both unscientific and distracts from the real harm so-called AI is already causing.

This post is especially ironic, since AI and its "safety researchers" make climate change worse by ridiculously increasing energy demands.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

So-called "AI safety" researchers are nothing but hypemen for AI companies.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

What about that bloke who started all this stuff about alpha and beta wolves?

 

Office space meme:

"If y'all could stop calling an LLM "open source" just because they published the weights... that would be great."