Medieval Dynasty: New Settlement in VR. It’s quite good, though a bit glitchy here and there. Finished the main quest line and am now running my tavern whilst waiting for my baby to be born.
LillyPip
That’s all very true and valid.
I don’t mean to imply anything here, but is it common to find a body, call 911, then bug out without giving any contact info?
Is it weird that I think the vast majority of people would want to stick around to see what was happening, at least?
If I found a body, I’d be interested in what happened, and why. If I found a burnt body in the wilderness, I’d probably not want to fuck off into that same wilderness alone with, perhaps, a survivalist murderer lurking. I’d probably wait for the authorities, since there’s safety in numbers. Maybe that’s just me?
She’s been made stateless, which is by definition illegal. There’s international law against doing exactly this (not that the US cares right now).
She’s brown, though, so why are we supposed to care? She’ll likely grow up to be a criminal or something, so it’s fine. Expedient, even.
If we take care of them at 2 years old, that’s less crime later. This is a good thing, if you really think about it.
And now I need to go take a shower just for typing that out loud.
Okay, how about actually presenting data to support your argument rather than just ‘nuh-uh’ and vague aspersions?
I will! Just so you know, I was 12, so I cant vouch for the quality of writing or gameplay, lol.
Did you look at my link?
These numbers are not referring to temporarily vacant homes that are in between buyers, but longer term vacancies, often held by investment firms. From the article:
Vacant homes and buildings often succumb to the elements and deteriorate due to leaks, damage and general lack of maintenance before ever finding a buyer willing to pay their inflated prices. An abundance of vacant homes on the market are also attributed to rising rent and home prices.
These homes can sit abandoned for years, causing neighbourhood blight and increased crime, in addition to removing opportunities from people who need housing.
Yes, it’s an uncaring capitalist thing, and no, it’s not a NIMBY thing – quite the opposite. The neighbourhoods with these homes would be far better off with residents than simply letting these homes rot .
There are solutions, and most vacant houses are in major cities, which is also where many homeless people already are.
Detroit, for example, has large numbers of homeless people and also large numbers of these houses. Same with New York, large cities in California, etc.
There are ways to solve this, but there’s no way these large corporations will participate in a solution out of the goodness of their heart.
Kinda… There’s not so much need to build, though, as there are currently 28 vacant homes for every one person experiencing homelessness in the U.S., many of which are owned not by individuals but by large corporations. The same corps that took advantage of the housing market collapses over the last several decades.
Large corporations are sitting on ridiculous numbers of vacant homes rather than make them affordable for people who need them. Fixing that would help.
Oh nice. Just remember to hydrate and get some sleep. It’s so easy to lose hours to that game!