Karl

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] Karl@literature.cafe 1 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It's a thread about Analog and digital clocks. Trump had no significance in it. You're something else man πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ And to top it off, No one gives a shit about trump in my country 🀣🀣 you're hilarious

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

Lol no one wants that orange clown. How tf did this get political even LMFAOAOAOAO. You're so run out of arguments, you had to bring in a politician into an argument about analog and digital clocks. You're the most unintentionally ridiculous guy I've bumped into on this platform πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

That doesn’t surprise me at all since you are still unable to learn such a simple thing after all these years, sweetie

Not me taking pride in a trivial thing I learnt. Just shows how hard it was for you. I learnt it and didn't make a big deal out of it, cuz Ik anyone could learn it if they wanted to.

[–] Karl@literature.cafe -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (24 children)

Are you sure, sweetie.

More sure than your parents when you were born sweetie.

Around 10 minutes.

Highly doubt it. A lot of people know how to read analog clocks but not many defend it like their life depends on it. It must've taken you majority of your childhood to learn it, if you're so proud of that trivial skill. πŸ€” Buuutt, since u don't even know how to read, that's not really a surprise.

Not that you can read all this without text-to-speech xD

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 5 points 5 days ago

Some ppl who just badly want to be angry.

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (26 children)

Long before you honey. But you still haven't learnt to read I see.

And judging by the way you're flexing that single useless skill, it must've taken you a LOT of time and energy to master. πŸ˜„

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 3 points 5 days ago

He's honestly so cringe. Must be a sour old guy who wants to demonstrate his superiority in the least effort taking way possible. He's made so many comments and not a single valid point. If he finds he cannot make a good argument, he turns to insulting and "rEaD aGaIn sLoWly".

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (28 children)

You too, honestly. It reads straightforward enough. If you somehow misread his comment, that's on you. Idk if you can really ask people to read.

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 5 points 6 days ago

Still wasn't large enough I see. I'm starting to suspect your ability to read. You're the best proof why reading comprehension is necessary. 🀑🀑🀑

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I said this a LOT of times sweetie, pls write it down.

Here we go.....

BRAINS ARE FASTER WITH SMALLER CALCULATIONS THAN CALCULATORS AND ANALOG CLOCKS ARE NOT FASTER THAN DIGITAL ONES IN ANY WAYS

Was that large enough? Can u see it?

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I am making sense. Not my problem you can't read. Or maybe u just hope u can gaslight me into thinking so, cuz u wanna answer it, but u dont know how to.

I did sweetie

"I very much doubt it."

[–] Karl@literature.cafe 4 points 6 days ago (40 children)

They can have a digital clock anytime they want, thus it doesn't matter. Ig, long paragraphs hurt u

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί