Yes, that makes it more comparable to MicroOS, which does the same with podman.
MicroOS is based on a more mainstream system but it's still immutable with transactional updates.
What I'm trying to ask is if the project's goal / development is being more MicroOS or more Proxmox Linux? & whether it tries be a replacement or a different workflow all together?
I see that there's a Migration Manager in beta as an install option to switch from vmware ESXi, so I wonder if other OS-level hypervisors are in the roadmap.
Kailn
joined 1 month ago
I know this is supposed to be compared with Vmware ESXi &or Proxmox but exclusively made for linux containers, so...
How well can it compare with MicroOS & CoreOS which rely podman instead?
I've never seen a detailed comparison between podman & incus in term of resource usage nor performance, just that podman supports docker compose & it's images.
So more ppl are re-purposing old, legacy win7 machines despite security risk...
Completely clueless about anything linux or floss in that matter wether even if there where lighter distros with better hardware support & enough apps for everyday office needs & more.
Like win7 can't even run any UWP apps, photoshop or steam anymore.
It's great livin' in 2025
I ended up writing so much that I made an essay long reply.
Sorry for the inconvince & wait...