HATEFISH

joined 2 years ago
[–] HATEFISH@midwest.social 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That maybbe true but feel free toTell me what is then. Developers are less interested in developing for a platform with heavy restrictions. If you have some sort of alternate take on that I'd like some of whatever you are smoking.

[–] HATEFISH@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sorry I wasn't granular enough for you I figured you'd get the whole thought - if I am not allowed to sell anything but ice cars ( can only use WebKit on the largest group of consumers) what would be the incentive for me to create one unless I can also afford to create a platform or brand to release them on (nobody with the capital to do this is going to make something to the benefit of the users)

[–] HATEFISH@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

If you are only allowed to use internal combustion engines how do you expect to get an electric car?

If you have no where to sell your product, why develop it?

[–] HATEFISH@midwest.social 15 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Kind of a strange semantics argument at that point. Saying you can only build with X tools certainly impacts development. Why develop something that would never be allowed to be released?