Well, "sweetie", I never personally insulted you and I took the effort to link sources for my claims so I got that going for me.. π€·
F04118F
Should I call it ecocide industry then?
Lung disease spreaders industry?
Epidemic production industry?
You don't have to care about animals at all to see the benefits of reducing meat production.
Imagine people ordering a "lentil burger", "soy burger", "plant burger", "bean burger", or "chickpea burger", and receiving a vegan meal.
Can you imagine how shocked and deceived, perhaps even violated they may feel? The horror!
Luckily the European Christian Democrats protected European citizens from this huge and common problem instead of, oh I dunno, helping European industry with the energy transition or end a genocide. They have their priorities straight here.
Or maybe, just maybe, this is another attempt by a panicked industry to slow down the transition to a slightly less cruel food production system and these politicians are earning some side money?
EDITED for tastefulness of words. The only words I changed are the only ones that OP quoted and responded to below. The rest of the message was ignored. I actually learned a valuable lesson today, thanks Felix!
G'nau
Wow, amazing!
If his previous lawnmower's readiness rate is as low as a typical jet fighter's, he's right to get another one
You're not advertising 196.x.x.x routes to your tailnet?
Fedora isn't, Red Hat Enterprise Linux is.
The paid Linux for companies that want a support contract.
Open source upstream is much newer, and doesn't have the bloat that Red Hat adds to Enterprise products.
This goes for:
Fedora -> Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Kubernetes -> OpenShift
Ansible -> Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
And probably others I don't know.
Point is, no one is buying the whole Red Hat Enterprise suite because they personally like Fedora.
They're buying it because someone somewhere in the org is (rightfully or not) too afraid to run open source software without being able to call in support from a company that knows how it works very well.
"The company behind Fedora" is Red Hat.
Red Hat is a huge provider of Enterprise products, from Linux (RHEL, based on Fedora) to Kubernetes (OpenShift) and Ansible (RHAAP).
The Red Hat Enterprise products all kind of suck compared to the upstream open source projects, but they often have a GUI. Think of it as "Ansible for dummies" or "Kubernetes for dummies".
Every homelabber worth their salt knows this, and I don't think Red Hat gets a lot of sales because people like Fedora.
In short: I would be very surprised if Red Hat were sponsoring videos about Fedora, let alone IBM.

Of course, the benefit of the Proton VPN CLI over Wireguard is ease of switching between any of the hundreds of servers when YouTube has blocked one again.
I agree that it's not an improvement from a security perspective.