Chippys_mittens

joined 1 month ago
-17
deleted (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

Deleted

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this one would run in circles. Good on ya though. Go argue with other posts I've made.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Its calm, morality is inherently subjective most of the time because it depends on each individuals value system. However, I believe some things are objectively morally wrong. You're driving down the street and see a random pedestrian, you stop, get out and shoot that pedestrian in the head, killing them. That is objectively morally wrong.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We mostly agree. I'd reiterate that I do think avoiding shameful discourse is paramount to finding common ground which is the position we seem to be stuck on. I'd also say again that ,yes, I think avoiding shame based dialoge is the most morally correct thing in instances like this. But I feel that is an objective fact and not a motivation for me personally. Its been a good discussion and I appreciate the things you've said and how they've challenged my ideas. I likely wont change my approach much, but, you've made the best case I've heard so far on this. I'm sure we'll be at odds again in another ask post, I look forward to future arguments haha.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

I recognize you're particularly bothered by me implying you feel morally superior. I'll accept that you dont shame people to feel superior. I apologize for making that assumption. I was wrong.

Anyway, Yeah, I own his book and have listened to many of his appearances online. I don't see how I'm misconstruing or poorly applying his message. I believe that engaging with someone on a ideological level is important and the best option, I don't see shaming as an effective tool to do that. I'll be very clear though, the individual this all sparked from seems to be a troll wasting both our time, not an individual open to any type of real conversation.

Yes I believe it is objectively more helpful and therfore more morally correct to do so. So sure, you could say I feel morally superior by not utilizing shaming language in most cases. That feeling isn't the driver for my actions just a biproduct (blame being raised by social workers). You already stated you don't want to change minds and you don't want people like that on your side. So I don't see us finding a middle ground, but the conversation has been a good distraction.

I'm gonna look like a dick for bringing it up but its pertinent. I volunteer monthly in youth outreach and in my experience shaming holds no benefit. In fact shame is like a horrible cancer in that setting that stops people from getting the help they need.These are at risk teens to general criminality not white supremacist organizations. But if I were in a different area they very well might be at risk of getting scooped up by some neo nazi group. I wouldn't start discussions by shitting all over the only other people that have so far helped/listened to/brainwashed the kid. I'd discuss the reasoning and try to help them understand the pitfalls in extremist view points.

My stance is communication and empathy are the most important parts to ending hateful thought. This isnt just a thing I argue with about with people online. I wholeheartedly want us to heal and grow as a society, and I don't see shaming/name calling being part of that. But, its absolutely possible I'm wrong. I'm wrong about shit all the time.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Yeah, we have a fundamental disagreement in morals. Thats fine, I think its very rare for someone to be too far gone to retrieve. Trolls are trolls though so I wont pretend this person is changeable. Im just of the camp that people have shitty opinions due to all kinds of factors. The only thing that changes those opinions is open dialoge. Shaming doesn't help at anyone at any point, aside from the shamer who gets to feel morally superior. I wont pretend to know you or your story and it wouldnt really change how I'm approaching this discussion. As I've said in other comments, I try to frame my perspective of the issue around Daryl Davis's approach to engaging with hate.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

You're never going to get someone to leave their side and come to yours with that mentality. Shaming them does nothing but make you feel superior. Use someone like Daryl Davis as an example.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I can't talk to them because all their comments were removed, not deleted by them, removed... This is also just a general thing for me not centered solely around this individual troll.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

No.... how do you get that from what I've said. We should out talk them, the example post given is very easy to poke holes in. People can and do change their minds, but only when challenged. Giving up, slapping a label on and holding moral superiority just grows their side. While you get to feel good about calling them a nazi. Doesn't help anyone and just pushes them further down that hate filled mindset. You beat hate with compassion and conversation, not more hate. Look into the artist Daryl Davis, his ideology around the subject is how I frame mine.

 

I've seen/read plenty of media about being locked up in various types of jails and prisons. But, I'd like to hear some first hand accounts from people. How'd you pass the time, see anything rough, what country were you in, did you rehabilitate yourself, was there even opportunity to rehabilitate yourself?

 

The question comes in light of the recent young republicans leaks. Firstly, I'm not a republican and I think the shit they were saying was out of line, regardless of context. That said, the situation, among countless other times similar things have happened made me think. Is it reasonable to hold individuals accountable for statements made that they thought were in private. I think the public figure aspect is obviously the main catch here. In instances where the individual is a public figure, they kind of made their bed in my opinion. That said though, the more normal and sensational these events become the more realistic it is to widen in scope. Would it be reasonable for a future employer or date to pull up your group chats/private messages/anonymous posts?

 

Mine is a bit niche. Male anti hero protagonist revenge movies. Usually takes place in england. Always has a heavy criminal element, a good bit of violence and the lead usually dies in the end. Recent favorites include "Bull" "Avengment" and "Villan". Not sure if this specific type of movie is a genre or not but there's plenty of them.

 

I recognize appreciating cool machines, I really do. I've just never been able to wrap my head around being a car guy. Spending huge chunks of change on a car, consistently modifying it, watching car shows all the time. I just dont get it. What's the big draw for you?

 

Seems like hard-core hate for anyone religious is fine in many circles. Is there a point where it becomes as problematic as other forms of bigotry? Not any specific religion necessarily just the disdain for the religious in general.

view more: next ›