I titled it appropriately
Bzdalderon
joined 4 months ago
Here in Canada they burned churches.
Also, leftist catch and release policy in Canada results in people with dozens of offences immediately put back on the street, and this has resulted in many murders, sexual assaults, continued violent crime by routine offenders. The weak on crime stance has resulted in massive crime increases here. Albeit not a political thing for the people doing the crimes, but a symptom of the policies.
Also, I think everyone is pro-Luigi if that's the crime you're talking about. Common ground for all
The rights I have today were gained through war, not through unfettered chaos.
No one rioted in the streets burning down buildings and looting them to give me my rights. My rights were given to me through wars that were fought. Organized, state in state violence, or organized state vs rebellion open conflict. The distinction is quite important.
Fair point on the TikTok thing. I guess I'm struggling with understanding why in any circumstance it would be good for an adult.
Like okay, to protect kids is the clear first order effect, but the second order effect is exposing adults to identity theft.
Third, real person tracing and tracking.
Government control over what individual people can and can't see.
I know I'm pushing that pretty rapidly to a 4/5th degree effect, but that's slippery slope I'm considering so you see my headspace.
I mean with ID verification, you can tie real life names to IP address easily, and then nmap a route to it to find the location. Pretty basic stuff and you can now stalk an adult, or worse, a child.
Better to be a wolf in a pack of coyotes, than a hare in a foxes stomach.
Not gonna lie, I did unironically propose something very similar to this once at work, and began looking into it.
Turns out I was too young to know what skynet is... I swear it would work though
Through war not chaos.
Fair enough, I'm just glad I got to post it haha
Im Canadian, I don't consider free healthcare radically left, or left at all really. There needs to exist some social supports, and healthcare is the bare minimum. We don't go far enough here.
I see a radical as someone who uses extreme language, proposes violent actions toward instituting their ideals, or condones or excuses physical violence on others because of their ideals. Even using cancel culture, or ban culture are ultimately just attacks on freedom of expression to me and would be considered radical by this definition.