My guess is you posted this on the wrong post.
Azteh
joined 2 years ago
It was a funnyjunk user who ate a whole bag of sugar free gummy bears and showed what the aftermath was of that decision
The story of peanutbitter
Well if they are just standing around and not actually shooting people they are still "participating" but aren't doing anything wrong
Ah fair enough. Thank you for the information
They clearly gave us the biggest hint in 2000
I don't agree with this practice of planned obsolescence, but aren't cars already their own planned obsolescence? You have to keep giving it fuel, so in terms of the analogy, wouldn't the company just stop selling fuel? You still have the parts, they just no longer function
Yes I'm aware that car manufacturers don't sell the fuel, which causes a problem with my analogy, but I can't see a perfect analogy for this case.
I have 2 days worth of food in my home. 4 days worth of lunch. When the 2 days of food runs out, I buy more on my way home. Same goes for when the lunch runs out. Meaning if I'm caught at a bad time, I'll have 0 food
It absolutely should matter if she did the deed, as that makes her a murderer, but I will concede that if they used corrupt means to convict her it does invalidate the whole process.
There is a very fine balance to be struck here that I don't think I can do justice.
If you've read the post, he has a decent line of illness that will make him incapable of taking care of loved ones, so to ease their burden he will cause sadness instead. Which one is better depends on who you ask. I hate feeling like a burden and I'm sure most people do, but sometimes it's necessary to stick around, but that is far from always the case.