Why are you continuing to cite an article that you yourself said is outdated, and are stating I am operating in bad faith by citing the conclusion of the article?
Yeah, that was in June, they hadn’t updated things yet and the 15% cuts hadn’t been announced either
Again, not saying you’re a bad faith actor, but
I am still holding hope that Pierre is on the way out, but I do agree that this 34% of Canadians represents a clear and present danger to Canada as a whole.
A third of Canadians need to get their heads on right.
From your source. Again.
Currently, the main estimates don’t suggest major cuts to the public service, Giroux said.
Currently, the main estimates don’t suggest major cuts to the public service, Giroux said.
Unfortunately for you, I did.
Economists, including Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux, have said that it could be difficult to achieve Carney’s spending promises without significant cuts.
Notice how it says "could be difficult" and not "absolutely impossible".
You have now used up all good faith.
Take care.
When you can provide a single piece of anything to support your point I am all ears.
I already did what you are asking, and I won't repeat myself again.
Take care.
Do you have something to add or are we done here?
I am using the same information everyone else is spinning to come to my conclusions. The difference is I am not speculating for personal benefit, or fear mongering in order to defend my position.
Facts of the matter are clear.
The Liberal platform stated that they are committed to capping employment instead of cutting employment and “As part of our review of spending we will ensure that the size of the federal public service meets the needs of Canadians.”, and Government departments have been asked to save 15% over 3 years with no direct orders to cut anything specific.
If you want to play with Occam's razor be sure not to cut yourself attempting to ground your speculation and assumptions in something real.
What percentage of the Federal budget is payroll?
What credible evidence have you seen to support that it isn't possible to "cut round it"?
What credible evidence do you have that demonstrates the Federal Government isn't trying to avoid employment cuts?
Now do everyone in, and in support of, the Likud party.