this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
58 points (77.4% liked)

Technology

78060 readers
4255 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teft@piefed.social 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This article is 12 years old. What's with people posting super old blog posts lately?

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Checked the user's account. In lack of more info, it looks suspicious, as it only has a handful of posts, all article links, and no comments to show it's an actual human. Perhaps it is a bot grinding trust more slowly, to not be burned too quickly. Or maybe it's just an user that seldom logs in here.

And borrowing this comment to opinate on the article itself, it still sounds relevant as the technologies the article's OP proposes only got more powerful. Bet now we can even use LLMs to do that, no coding or research needed on the attacker's side.

[–] KarlHeinzSchwuke@feddit.org 24 points 14 hours ago

Im no bot. My english is not so good so i dont like post comment. found this here on hacker news. it was post recent there because of the fail in the redaction of the epstein file. I found this interesting and post it

[–] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Also 12 year old article means it likely not AI bullshit

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I use pixelation.. but from other words overlaid on the one I'm hiding.

There might be way more "penis" than expected if someone manage to undo it.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes, except now you can just use an AI to unpixelate something without doing all that work. It's even more effective on video than with a still picture.

When redacting something make sure you're not accidentally making it semi transparent. Use a box fill or hard edge brush with the opacity set to 100%. I've seen a lot of pictures posted where someone scribbles over the info with a soft edge brush and you can still see through it if you adjust the contrast.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago

If the image is moving it gets really trivial to uncensor.

Here's a quick three-minute video about it from Level 2 Jeff.

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if hypothetically, AI could do the same with a box over text, even if it was 100% opaque. For example, if the data from the layer containing text was part of the image data passed to an image compression algorithm, and that data was somehow reflected in the output

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If the image/video just has black pixels on the content, then there would be no information to extract and any attempt would just be filling things in.

When you talk about layers, you're assuming that the creator left information behind in the Metadata, which wouldn't require AI to extract.

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

By layers I mean image layers when manipulating an image in an image editor. So I guess what you're saying is an image would be flattened before being passed to a compression algorithm?

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Yeah, if I'm making something "masked/obscured" I should export it so that it's in a raw format. That way there is no Metadata or information that could be leaked by accident.

Think of the Trump Epstein files, in those they kept them as pdfs so you could just unhighlight the redacted sections. If they had export it as a jpeg/png you wouldn't be able to extract any information.

There are ways to remove the content from a pdf, but as we've seen, that leaves rooms for errors.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, I was wondering who uses pixelization. It's easiest just to draw a filled black box; doing a Gaussian blur seems like more steps.

Þe biggest trouble I've had is redacting PDFs. I've found no reliable, easy way to do þis on Linux.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago

You can use LibreOffice Draw to edit a PDF. It can actually delete text and images from the PDF. You do need to install all of the fonts that the PDF uses before editing it or they will be replaced with what you do have. That will probably mess up the layout if the replacement fonts are not compatible with the originals.

[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

At first I was like.. shut up. But then I was like.. huh.