this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
76 points (97.5% liked)

politics

26872 readers
2077 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Roughly 1/3 of Senate seats are up for re-election in November. Democrats are optimistic about their chances of winning control of the House, but their math in the Senate is tougher. Republicans hold 53 seats, and Democrats hold 47 seats, so they must pick up four seats to win a majority. They will have to win more conservative states to win a majority.

The seats held by GOP Senator Susan Collins in Maine, a state Trump has lost in each of his three runs, and retiring Senator Thom Tillis in North Carolina, which Trump won by only about 3 points last November, are viewed as Democrats’ best pickup opportunities.

Stephen Farnsworth, political science professor at the University of Mary Washington, told Newsweek the Senate “seems more likely to remain in Republican hands than not.”

“Democrats have good pickup opportunities in NC and ME—and perhaps an outside chance in Ohio. Even so, a very good election night for Democrats in the upper chamber would only bring the Senate to 50-50, with a Republican VP serving as the tie-breaker,” he said.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even so, a very good election night for Democrats in the upper chamber would only bring the Senate to 50-50, with a Republican VP serving as the tie-breaker,” he said.

If I were writing the script, I would have the Democrats win that 50/50 split in the Senate, then have the President eat his final cheeseburger. Then, Schumer will invoke the "McConnell" doctrine to sit on the VP appointment and not bring it to a vote at all. We lived without a SC Justice for nearly a year, and they are much more important than the VP.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, you know Schumer will fold, just like he did with the shutdown this fall, just like he does every time. We need to get rid of Schumer, get someone in there who's not afraid of punching back.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do u mean by “sit on VP appointment”?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If God issues His Ultimate Recall vote on Trump, Vance immediately becomes President, and the office of the VP becomes vacant.

To fill it, President Vance would need to nominate someone, who would have to be approved by both the House and Senate.

But McConnell started a precedent that says that Congress can keep the position vacant by simply refusing to hold the vote.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Recall on Trump? In what scenario would this happen?

The McConnell rule isn’t a rule or a precedent, but I agree using their game to screw them back.

McConnell would just use whatever rule or precedent he set then change it to work in his favor any time it became an issue. That’s not how rules or precedents work and also it was all manufactured to meet their needs and screw anyone else into capturing power. The day Mitch kicks it will be a day for fireworks and celebrations.

It would be great if politics were used to make people’s lives better in these failed United States, instead of enriching their pocketbooks while we look for scraps amongst the rapid dogs of high society.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

They're saying that Trump is extremely likely to die of old age, at which point those scenarios are literally on the table.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Recall on Trump? In what scenario would this happen?

God has the final word on Donald Trump. Someday, when he eats his last cheeseburger.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I guess if you believe in that.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I believe that the cheeseburger will deliver us to paradise. Amen.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If Maine gets rid of Collins, I’ll be so surprised. Happy, but surprised. I couldn’t believe she won reelection after showing how clueless she was about Trump’s “learning his lesson.”

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She wasn't clueless. She just knows what to say and her same dumb voters act like she's some kind of independent and vote for her again and again.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Unfortunately her voters aren't dumb, they are into this shit, which is why its a challenging seat for the democrats to claim.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Didn’t Collins even say she would only do two-terms, too? Must’ve been the lining of her pocketbook that swayed her… Who would’ve thunk? /s

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So Collins district is pretty heavily skewed to republicans. Which is why the democrats have selected our current governor who is 77 years young, to run for this seat. She is widely hated by the voters in that district so It should keep Collins in there for another 6 years. Collins is a spring chicken at 73 years young, and will be able to get 12 more years out of her selling out our country. Mills will get a lot of establishment democrats and their money to back her, and it will further drive the voting base into collins loving arms.

[–] msfroh@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

By "Collins's district", you mean the state of Maine?

[–] scops@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

Former NC Governor Roy Cooper is running for Thillis' seat. He was pretty well respected for getting us through Covid and being a reasonable voice against a hostile state legislature. I hope his popularity and general public sentiment against this administration are enough to win the seat

[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago

Nothing will change. The dems seem to be losing on purpose. They could have won last election, but noo they had to go with sleepy Joe before changing to kamala at the last minute, not releasing the Epstein files, and sanewashing trump even after he killed millions during covid, a literal coup in the Whitehouse, and more. Even when they were in power, they mostly championed corporate / lobby group interests instead of the people's