this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
47 points (87.3% liked)

science

23176 readers
683 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 day ago

This corresponds to roughly 13 percent of the process emissions — the CO2 released by the underlying chemical reaction — in U.S. cement manufacturing.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Numbers here are misleading :
(13% and 25% of CO~2~ produced during manufacturing)

These percentage are based on what is produce during the year while existing cement things that are picking up CO~2~ were fabricated in the span of many decades.

trivial example to illustrate what i am saying here
...
supposed we are making each year one new building for 100 years in a row.
After that time, we have 100 buildings picking up CO~2~ from the air but in that year we create only one new building.
Now, we calculate total amount of CO~2~ picked up by 100 building divided by CO~2~ emitted to build this new single building.

This is how misleading this calculation is.

in fact if we were to make new buildings at a steady pace for long enough, we would eventually reach "kinetic equilibrium" in which the rate of CO~2~ picked up is equal to the rate of CO~2~ emitted : so we would reach 100% of annual CO2 production. (equilibrium)

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 hours ago

This is old news. And it doesn't pull enough to offset the CO² produced from chalk burning.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now now, let's not be hasty...