this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
124 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

10790 readers
849 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This will mark Canada's demise. An ex Blackrock executive for US-CA relations, he will sell our lives for a quick buck and a place near his mates.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 27 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

It's almost like a party led by a neoliberal corporate whore banker will do nothing to fight the late stage capitalist oligarchy created by corporations and bankers...

[–] CalloftheDirtyWhiteBoy@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah at this point we're just kind of watching how things go any way they're going. What little access the average person had to power (or the illusion of) is being erroded more and more and people are going to have to realize that if at all.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

We didn't have much choice. PP is such a pushover that he would have speedrun us into the US. We were between a rock and a hard place and both choices were shite. Too bad the NDP couldn't stop sucking off JT while he was in office. They ruined our chances of having a real opposition.

[–] Threeskittiesinatrenchcoat@lemmy.ca 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I'll always respect Singh for choosing the country over his political ambitions when he didn't let the CPC trigger an earlier election. However it didn't work out well for the NDP, this kind of political play looked bad but in reality they put country over politics, which was used against them again and again in the outlets owned by Postmedia.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

With that said, an Avi or Rob NDP would probably fare much better during the next election, don't you think?

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not last time. It was "do Canadians want to become the CNMI now, or in a year?"

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Those are the choices you're told you have. There are always others.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Like what? Is there a plan?

What are the assumptions you're making about what constitutes an option?

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The most important thing going on between the US and Canada (the countries in play here) is the renegotiation of CUSMA/USMCA. A savvy business type that knows the US playbook intimately is exactly who I would want at the helm.

This guy is not being brought up manage social programs or the environment. He is the US ambassador.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 24 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

How much power do you think an ambassador has? Especially the US ambassador. Ambassadors to other countries may hold significant sway, as the rest of the government may be relying on the ambassador for knowledge and recommendations on affairs relating to that country. For the ambassador to the US, the whole government, and a good chunk of the general population is already paying very close attention to the US. The ambassador is just a messenger.

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

A pro corporations ambassador who was selected by our government! Not a good sign. $$ will flow but not where it should !

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, that's a valid opinion to have, but how does that relate to anything I said?

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

It doesn't but you brought up coherent, valid points which didn't vibe with the kneejerk "corporate world bad for Canada for reasons" reaction.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

If you're disgusted by the shit the liberals are doing help build a properly social-democratic NDP: https://lewisforleader.ca/

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I hate how it wants my number and email.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's a small part of the price of a working democracy. A democracy where we don't perpetually vote between figures who don't really represent us.

[–] OliveMoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Carney has created trade internationally that we didn’t have before. He is standing up to the USA. He has an excellent reputation globally, and other countries are responding.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

And he appointed a BlackRock exec for an ambassador among other interesting decisions. If you end up liking his track record by the next election, you could give him another vote. If you don't, there better be a decent alternative. But in any event, Carney having legitimate electoral competition from the left can only make him deliver better for us.

BTW, I did contribute to Carney's campaign and voted for him as he was the only medicine that could have prevented a PP government, but from what I've seen so far, I'm under no illusion that he's going to deliver substantially for me instead of the corporate elite. He's doing alright on some fronts and not so good on others. I see no motion to deliver for labour outside of helping corporations in the hope that lifts labour. Which is just good ol' trickle-down economics. My vote wasn't an excuse to not put my energy into helping the NDP become an electable, leftist alternative. We need that more than ever in recent history.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

In IR, I am always a proponent of reciprocity. It always sends the right message.

Considering the poor quality US ambassador sent to Canada, I was disapointed to see Carney didn't appoint Trudeau as Canada's ambassador to the US. It would have been perfect.

Edit: He can virtue signal to those fuckers all day long.

"Canada is willing to let 5x the quota of American dairy in tarrif free if the milk is made from a certified woke farms. The ownership of the farms must be 100% minority women, the employees 100% unionized, with a minimum 30% LGBTQ2S+ workforce with a living wage, full health, dental and pharma benefits. The dairy cows must be given maternity leave, 2 weeks vacation and be 100% organically raised with quality feed and no hormones. You also need the cows consent."

As the trade team storms out of the room seeing the futility of advancing their agenda with Trudeau, Justin, dressed the entire time as a trans Statue of Liberty, chases after them down the hall screaming "I have some pamphlets on bovine reproduction and freedom of choice I forgot to give you! Wait! Come back!"

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

This is fucking gold-level hosery.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 6 points 13 hours ago

Former Chair of AIMco and former CEO of CPPIB, and his baby mama is Country Head of Canada for BlackRock. Also, co-founder of the Century Initiative.

[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 5 points 10 hours ago

Carnies can just do that now?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't it the case that the receiving country accepts the ambassador out of common courtesy, but is actually free not to accept his credentials and simply ignore him?

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

Here hoping that just being there he wont have too much sway. But the sole proximity of these types to the government feels like a bad thing.

[–] vogo13@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What do you know, I was severely downvoted for pointing this out in a post the other day. The Canadian boycott is failing, if not more likely it's already officially failed. American private equity has fully bought Canada. Canadian's are still investing en-masse into the S&P500 and are in love with American services like social media, tech devices, digital infrastructure, etc. Canadians have no problem with Carney's conflict of interest as Brookfield is the fourth biggest company in Canada by market cap (he has millions invested in the real estate cookie jar) and seven out of the top ten companies in Canada are banks and private equity. Canada is finished, there is no economy, and there certainly won't ever be one at this rate.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The Canadian boycott Is succeeding beyond all expectations.

Travel especially but also food. Jim Beam is ceasing operations at one of their plants and the Canadian boycott is a major factor.

Are Canadians still invested too much in US tech. Yes. As is the entire world.

The one area I would love to see things ramp up is cars. If Canadians stopped buying US manufactured cars, that would really make a difference.

And while I cannot imagine what you think Carney has to do with banks being some of the biggest businesses in Canada, this is one of the success stories of Canadian sovereignty. Canadian banks bought US assets for pennies on the dollar in 2008. Same for Canadian real estate players. If things continue as they are, they may get a chance to do it again.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Canadian banks bought US assets for pennies on the dollar in 2008.

While that's true, there's a not-so-visible side effect. The AMCB (TD US) segment of the bank has very significant influence on decisions at TD Canada. The bank that was TD in 2008 is a much more American style operation today. Have insider info on this. Also its US side exposes it to the American meltdown-to-be, unlike the situation in 2008.

[–] OliveMoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Agreed. Carney is a global force. Is he a banker? Yes. Maybe look at his resume.