politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
And the factories that arent fully-automated, will be Asian-style sweatshops, with low pay, no benefits, no unions, teen labor, no health/ safety/ environmental regulations, mandated overtime without OT pay, etc.
Everybody who is excited about the "return of manufacturing" is deluding themselves if they think the new mamufacturing model is going to emulate the model that sent manufacturing overseas in the first place.
That's just it .... I think part of the plan (if you can call it that) is to crater the US economy and send everyone out into the streets with nothing ... millionaires and billionaires won't be affected (or affected that much) .... once everyone is poor with no choice, no voice, no ability, no money, then you can restart and rebuild an economy built on sweatshop, low pay, even no pay, no benefits, no unions, teen labor, child labor, no health / safety / environmental regulations, mandated overtime with no OT pay, etc
Why go to Asia to get this? .... just bring it all to America. No better model of manufacturing than to do everything at home rather than send out business to the other side of the globe .
They're gonna have a great time building their army of wage slaves, until they find out they have no one left to sell to.
They're trying to create a consumer economy with no consumers.
Sure, after all, you get to save all that money on shipping from Asia, and all that sweet profit goes directly into their pockets. It might be as much as a 1% increase!
That's worth destroying America, and the lives of 99% of our population, AND the world economy, for an inconsequential amount of money for people who already have more money than they or their heirs can ever spend.
It's easier to unionize domestically. Yes, they will start as non-union. But then you can unionize them.
Not to say this is the way to bring them back;; it's absolutely not. But it would be GOOD if measures were in place to actually bring them back, as they could be forced to provide higher paying jobs
Ah yes. The one mechanic per hundred machines or whatever is totally the same as millions of factory jobs.
Why the hell do these people want to be enslaved in factories anyway?
We can have unskilled labor that doesn't involve possibly being mangled by machinery.
The problem isn't the jobs, it's the lack of jobs and the wage rate not keeping pace with production capacity and inflation for the last 50 years.
Why the hell do these people want to be enslaved in factories anyway?
There is a very specific type of American subset that is in love with that fantasy. Real, honest, hard, labor, subservient and reliable. It gives some people purpose, value, even hope. Even for those who did not experience it firsthand, there is a tangible sense of loss for that type of American experience.
Like religion, labor can function as meaning when life appears too complex for deeper understanding.
"enslaved in factories"
Factories and similar jobs are the first ones that got unionized and work conditions ended up being the best that someone could expect without higher educations. That's what people lost with globalization and what they think they'll get back, but without unions that won't happen.