this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
89 points (98.9% liked)

science

23069 readers
402 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new global review argues that many “transition” projects touted by oil and gas companies, such as hydrogen hubs, biofuels, or carbon capture and storage, are doing more to lock in the fossil economy than to wind it down.

Drawing on 48 environmental conflict cases across continents, researchers from ICTA-UAB and the University of Sussex examined a range of fossil fuel “transition” initiatives.

The team found that these projects often fall short of climate goals, deepen environmental injustice, and entrench the political power of the very companies driving the crisis.

The authors argue this isn’t a sideshow – it’s the strategy. By coupling new “low carbon” facilities to existing refineries, pipelines, and gas-fired power stations, companies can justify running legacy assets for decades.

The proposed H2Med pipeline from Barcelona to Marseille is emblematic: marketed for hydrogen, it could also carry fossil gas, extending the life of old networks under a green banner.

In practice, many projects operate as add-ons: “blue” hydrogen dependent on fossil methane; biofuels that displace forests or food; offsets that permit ongoing emissions elsewhere.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 9 points 18 hours ago

And always with a shifting percentage.

100% green hydrogen -> let's start with some 10% blue -> 50% blue not, enough green capacity yet -> 50% green is hard. Let's keep it at 5% for now -> maybe hydrogen and natural gas mix 90/10 -> we studied the economics of this and think 50/50 is cheaper to get the project going -> so we settled on 95% natural gas and optionally 5% blue hydrogen added so we can technically keep calling it a hydrogen project.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 7 points 23 hours ago

They always do.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

This is like asking tobacco companies to find a solution to smoking.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Just like Saudi Arabia hosting COP-21.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Tobacco companies are super eco friendly.

The less humans the less CO2 in the atmosphere.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They did, nicotine is vaped now.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 16 hours ago

one of the things they funded is "pretend eco-friendly companies" that tell customers to buy thier products.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 2 points 10 hours ago

See, we’re trying to be green. Keep giving us money and don’t feel bad. We sure don’t.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

But they keep the profits up, don't they?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

@chemtrail people: they are right there, in the pic.