this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
84 points (98.8% liked)

World News

51374 readers
1649 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For several years now, in discussing plans for its human spaceflight program beyond the International Space Station, Russian officials would proudly bring up the Russian Orbital Station, or ROS.

The first elements of ROS were to launch in 2027 so it would be ready for human habitation in 2028. Upon completion in the mid-2030s, the station would encompass seven shiny new modules, potentially including a private habitat for space tourists. It would be so sophisticated that the station could fly autonomously for months if needed.

Importantly, the Russian station was also to fly in a polar orbit at about 400 km. This would allow the station to fly over the entirety of Russia, observing the whole country. It would be important for national pride because cosmonauts would not need to launch from Kazakhstan anymore. Rather, rockets launching from the country’s new spaceport in eastern Russia, the Vostochny Cosmodrome, would easily reach the ROS in its polar orbit.

That was the plan, at least until this week, when a Russian official dropped a bombshell.

Recycling the ISS

Oleg Orlov, director of the Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said ROS will no longer be composed of entirely new modules. Rather, its core will be the Russian segment of the International Space Station.

“The Scientific and Technical Council of Roscosmos supported this proposal and approved the deployment of a Russian orbital station as part of the Russian segment of the ISS,” Orlov reportedly said.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Would that be the station core that's cracking, leaking, seemingly getting worse, and which they haven't been able to fix?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All spaceframes have a limited service life due to the extreme thermal and structural load cycling they experience in earth orbit. The ISS was only meant to last 15 years and its only by happenstance, new modules, and good engineering protocols that its been stretched to 2030.
The alloys of aluminum that make up most of their structure always have a limited load cycle service life. It is never a question of if it will crack, it is when. Reusing ANY part of it for a space station meant to be serviced past 2030 is just a ticking time bomb. Russia is gonna kill their cosmonauts for sure.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Again (allegedly)

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yep, still sounds like Russia's new space station.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] chocrates@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's just dropping satellites at units? 🤣🤣

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It goes in three tiers. First just a satellite (Sputnik), then that and some space junk, then third tier is a whole ass space station (Mir)

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For now Russia doesn't even have a suitable launch pad for their rockets!
Their last functional pad collapsed with the rocket they launched last month.

https://www.sciencealert.com/russia-faces-space-mission-crisis-after-severe-soyuz-launch-pad-accident

Russia is collapsing just like that launchpad did, and this will never go anywhere.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please don’t set the orbit path over my home for when it inevitably starts falling apart.

if they reuse ISS parts, the orbit will stay mostly the same as today. Delta V for orbit changes is a bitch.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

So they won't be using the Baikonur Cosmodrome?

"On 27 November 2025, one of the cosmodrome's launchpads sustained significant damage following the launch of the Soyuz MS-28 rocket carrying three astronauts to the International Space Station.[27]" from Wikipedia

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wonder if it's because they're running out of money

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Why buy new space station when old one station still works? Why develop new shuttle, just strap 2 rockets to my uncle's 1986 moskwitsch!

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

The bits of the ISS that keep springing leaks?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Well, if it works on the Ukraine front, why not in space? Oh, wait...