this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
581 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

27937 readers
339 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
581
GDPR Wrapped (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 93 points 3 days ago
[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 86 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Oh god, uBlock or privacy badger needs to do this

[–] MSBBritain@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (5 children)

While funny, the whole idea of tracking your data enough to give you a wrapped kind of goes completely against everything these extensions are supposed to do.

My suggested alternative is you click the wrapped button and it just says:

"Fucked if I know! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It could keep a local count, wouldn’t need to communicate it out. It basically already shows you how many things are getting blocked, it would just be a funny end of year easter egg

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah a local record of blocked ads would be trivial to save and no need to upload.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 7 points 3 days ago

"who cares, fuck em"

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Well. uBlock does track total blocks

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

But it does say right on that page:

Take note that the network request logger in uBO is a forward-looking logger: this means only future requests can be logged.

In the spirit of efficiency, uBO will log entries IF AND ONLY IF the logger is opened. Otherwise, if the logger is not opened, no CPU/memory resources are consumed by uBO for logging purpose.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Or it could just be made up static data

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 17 points 3 days ago
[–] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

That would legit get me to pay them or donate or something. Such a hilarious idea.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 9 points 3 days ago

I totally want a uBO version of that

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You clicked "Accept all" ONCE in a real hurry, huh?

This used to give me nightmares. Then I learned to love the bomb: Clean out everything each time you close your browser.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And all that's left is your fully trackable browser fingerprint.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So if I'm identified as unique how bad is that? Is fingerprinting so critical that it makes all my other attempts at privacy pointless, or is it a niche edge-case that you don't really need to worry about?

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I do not think ads would keep tracking you though browser fingerprinting. Maybe just a little.

But, say, you are being prosecuted and your traffic is being looked at. No one can defend you if a fingerprint of your browser shows up somewhere where it shoulnd't have been. You being a unique one with this fingerprint means that nobody but your machine accessed that IP address.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would a fingerprint uniqueness hold up in court?

It kinda feels like saying: "we know the crime was committed by someone who's this tall with this hair color and this skin color and has this tattoo on the right arm and who speaks these three languages and we have never seen anyone else who matches all of those things so it must be you"

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it points to your IP but not your PC - probably won't hold. Same if IP is wrong but fingerprint is fine. But if both are matching, there is no doubt. You know, not many Windows 11 Pro Laptops with intel 125H, 4060m, 1440p 144hz screen, Firefox version, exact same font list, system language, setting preferences exist on the planet. It is a fingerprint in the similar way an actual fingerprint works.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh right I hadn't thought of combining it with the IP itself.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, so e.g. you open site A without a VPN and then later, site B with a VPN on the same browser.
Your browser is now recognised and site B may sell you ads based on what you did on site A, or maybe region-block you based on your IP with site A.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 20 hours ago

The things that give it off (i.e. 0.00%):

  • List of fonts (JS)
    • I think this should be an easy fix. Just provide some, widely-used fonts to the browser and not all the 200 fonts that are on the system
  • HTML5 Canvas
    • I have no idea what this is based on, but shouldn't it be possible to randomise it every time, so that even though it is unique every time, it is so for everyone and every time they refresh the page?
  • Audio data (sometimes)
    • happened in LibreWolf, but not in Firefox
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago

Sure, it's still better to NOT click Accept all once in a hurry.

But my browser does mitigate some of that.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How much does privacy badger help with that

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Is this that metadata I hear so much about /s

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

data shared with 17203 partners

Only 17203? I feel like that's low

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago

I wonder what the 2025 version will be ;)

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

The "Login teminder popup remover" userscript works well for me. Additionally to an adblocker of course.