this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
41 points (86.0% liked)

Science Memes

17736 readers
1825 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 45 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Hi what the fuck does this mean

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I think the x-axis labels are wrong. Cosine similarity is used to compare vectors in maths. 1 would mean the vectors are going in the same direction and 0 would mean they are going 90° to each other and -1 is opposite.

[–] VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

While it seems you’re on to something with the x-axis, I do not believe that was the question. My interpretation, that I share, is wtf am I looking at? Haha

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

I found this, which sheds a little more light on the topic?

collapsed inline media

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

I think it’s a joke about an attempt to formulate the single racial slur that most closely correlates to all slurs at once

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago

So the x-axis should be the same as the y-axis in this case?

How do you calculate the cosine of a slur? Is that the joke?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago

Why would you make a post about slurs and then censor all of them.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Imagine modeling the components of a word mathematically. Each word has a value in some number of dimensions, like maybe how negative the word is, or how much it has to do with fruit or something.

You’d be able to calculate a set of eigenvectors to describe each dimension, basically unit vectors. You could have an eigen-name or eigen-compliment, basically just a word that other names or compliments could be expressed in units of that word.

I think 1984’s Newspeak shows some examples of what eigen-words could be. Stuff like “doublepluscold.”

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

Ok, I'm a physicist so math is fine. I just couldn't get the diagram. Thanks!

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 11 points 9 hours ago

The interpretation here depends on the idea of a word-vector. This is a component of language models which treat each individual word in a language as a vector in a pretty high-dimensional space (how high is up to the model author). The way this is usually described is that if you look at the word pairs "man - woman", "boy - girl", "king - queen" and so on, they should differ by a similar vector in word-vector-space, and that vector should correspond to the concept of "male" (or "female" depending on which way round you do it). If you have a word vector model, you should then be able to take the dot product of this gender concept-vector with a word like "actress" or "actor", and see if it has learnt that "actress" is female and "actor" is kinda male but kinda gender neutral due to changing usage.

So what this diagram is showing is a measure of similarity between various word vectors. Those vectors are (the vector of) a slur minus a related word. The idea is to see if subtracting "Mexican" from "spic" leaves you with an underlying concept of "slur" that corresponds to these other vectors - just like with gender and man, woman; boy, girl, etc.

The confusion matrix is actually pretty interesting IMO. There is pretty high similarity between all of the "racial slur - race" vectors, and much less between "cunt - woman" and "fag - homosexual" and the others. So it's showing that there isn't that good a concept - in this word vector model at any rate - of "slur" in general, but you could argue pretty strongly that racial slur does exist in that way.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Is the first one 'South Mexican'?

Then we've got 'Crumbly Chinese'

'Fucking homosexuals' (nice)

'No African' (rude)

'Clever Woman'

'Kill Jewish? Kippah Jewish? Kangaroo Jewish?'

And obviously, the 'Jolly Japanese'

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 7 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Spic Chink Fag Cunt Kyke Jap

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't heard anyone use "Jap" outside my grandfather's generation — and he fought a fucking war against them so no surprise he had some big feels there. But he's also been dead about 25 years and I've never heard the word since.

But also I don't hang out with racists, so what do I know.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago

I once met a Chinese girl who was somewhat suspiciously fond of the English slang term (that I hadn't heard of) "Jap's Eye" which apparently means "urethral opening" and tbf I would never use the latter term either...

OTOH I had heard the term from time to time and it always came across to me (not Japanese - important caveat) as a pretty mild one, like "frog" for the French. I would be very unsurprised if it were different in the USA though, where there was such a big impact from WW2 and internment.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

How have I lived with a Jewish family all my life and never heard 'Kyke', yet I was well aware of 'Faggot' after only knowing about gay people for much less time?

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

Humans are a mysterious race.

“F….., f….., f….., we can say it together — but only if you let a white girl say n…..”

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Honestly most of these are out of fashion anyway

[–] verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

Aren’t the x-axis labels wrong? If I’m interpreting this correctly, the x and y axes labels should be the same. That might be partly why people are getting confused.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Derrick's "Spelling Bee" suggests cell D3 should be dominant.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Can someone expand these asterisks?