this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26738 readers
3108 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An agreement between moderate Republicans and GOP leadership in the House to allow a vote on extending expiring Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies is on the rocks as the two sides squabble over the contents of the amendment.

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) and other GOP centrists are planning to introduce an amendment in the House Rules Committee on Tuesday that pairs a two-year extension of the subsidies with eligibility reforms, according to a House GOP staffer who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

But GOP leadership insisted the extension needed to be offset with spending cuts — a demand the moderates balked at. Conservatives opposed to extending the subsidies have frequently cited the cost, which is estimated to be at least $35 billion per year.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bill for bombs or corporate bailouts: We have infinite money!

Bill to assist paying for health care for poor people: We have no money! We must cut other spending on services for poor people to pay for this!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but some Blah people might accidentally get something for free!

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've got a solution you dumb fucks, cut the needless tax cuts you're funneling to billionaires

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago

But that's the entire reason so many are there

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Whoa easy there commie

/s

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Eligibility reforms" means "give overworked people a ton of extra paperwork to do in the hope that they either give up or make an error so that we can drop them."

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Help a little now, to hurt a lot later.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

And that roadblock? Conservatives and their ridiculous ideology.