“after a review of the evidence that was gathered, it was determined that the person of interest needed to be released.”
Just sayin', maybe you review the evidence BEFORE you name someone a person of interest and arrest them?
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
“after a review of the evidence that was gathered, it was determined that the person of interest needed to be released.”
Just sayin', maybe you review the evidence BEFORE you name someone a person of interest and arrest them?
I don't think it's that uncommon to detain someone for 24 hours for questioning and while evidence is built. What IS embarrassing is that the name leaked and photos of the wrong person were circulated, and then they realized they had the wrong guy anyways... And now 100 hours later the shooter is still unknown and on the move.
Same thing with the Trump ear shooting.
Federally Bungled Investigations