Anyone got a link to a meaningful description of improvement, rather than "pretty colours" and a "better package solver"?
My most frequent use of apt is inside a Dockerfile, so care factor on UI is not high and "better" isn't a measurable metric.
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
51 points (96.4% liked)
Linux
7115 readers
343 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
When scripting, it's better to use apt-get instead of apt:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/590699/should-i-use-apt-or-apt-get-in-shell-scripting
Yes but apt-get isn't a seperate package from apt, just a seperate command. All of the apt-* commands are part of the same package, which is now Apt-3.0. This isn't really what the user above you was asking.
Never knew that! Always wondered what this apt-get was, supposed it was some older alias or something
It kind of is. For a very long time it was the only option.
All well and good, but that doesn't cover "better". Does this mean apt-get et. al. were improved, or just apt? Where's the documentation for this "improvement"?
Hence my question.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apt+3.0
Edit for those who couldn't be bothered to click through the first result:
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/blob/main/debian/changelog
Parallel downloads finally?
I still think I’ll stick with nala as my apt front-end but hopefully this will be a more robust backend.