I seriously doubt this meets the scientific standard for taxonomy definitions.
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
21 points (81.8% liked)
science
22957 readers
330 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Maybe in some technical or traditional sense, but let's not forget that most species are named almost completely arbitrarily in the first place, sometimes simply echoing their finder's own name.
Meanwhile, for all our 'great gifts of sapience,' in the end we are proving to be the most foolish and self-destructive of our ape cousins (and other kin) by a veritably planet-sized margin.
But you believe that "sapiens" is somehow scientific? Gotta give up on that scientism.