this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
480 points (97.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

43174 readers
1438 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 202 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a bit sad

They were kinda little time capsules of various corners of YouTube adjacent internet culture over time

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The only good thing YT Rewind was for was finding out what kind of boring bullshit channels normies watch.

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That sounds a bit elitist tbh

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago

Yeah all you gotta do is open it in a private browsing window and see the stream of aI nonsense to know what most morons are watching, or at least clicking.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

sEcReT iNtErNeT cLuBhOuSe

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See they're running out of disk space though. Preserving history is so much less important than 58 minute video essays about [insert any banal topic].

[–] p_consti@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unlisting just means they're not shown in searches, the video is still available, so storage has nothing to do with it

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. I saw that after I wrote my comment.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Babe you've never unlisted your old (cringe) Minecraft tutorials. What a childhood lol

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Lol I have actually do have some unlisted videos, I just forgot what that meant until I was reminded

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 151 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Add another thing to the Google Graveyard ig.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sorry Will, looks like it's no longer rewind time 😞

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Dahhhhh 😣

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Is the 2025 one just a flood of nazi propaganda?

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

No, that was 2016

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] percent@infosec.pub 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I assumed it's probably due to some creators becoming, or later being discovered as, "problematic" and/or some sort of brand risk. It would look more strange to unlist a few of them, so better to unlist all of them.

To be clear: This is speculation based on zero information 🙃. Just a total guess based on how things tend to go between internet culture and corporations. I'm probably wrong. It would be cool if YouTube would communicate things like this.

It's unfortunate to see such cultural history hidden away. Though, tbh, this is probably the most that I've ever thought about YouTube Rewind, and I haven't thought about it in many years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why is this even mildly infuriating? Who's that emotionally invested in a corporation and a bunch of influencers patting each other on the back?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Just preserved youtube history and culture.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The Weezer pork and beans video was actually fucking sweet

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Why have them? What are they?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Marketing videos, mostly. Ostensibly they're original videos showcasing some of the talent and content from the previous year. The last couple of years have been particularly bland, though, as I understand it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I don't know what YouTube Rewinds are, but are these them? I seem to be able to view them.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTTASUq6isfvyOXnYzM8Jgc28tET8PMc4

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think unlisted means they just won’t appear in search/recommended, but can still be viewed if you link directly to them

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh… maybe done so the new one is the only result? That makes this a hell if a lot less of an issue.

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Rewinds haven't been produced in like a decade

Half a decade *

I wanted to be right about rewind being dead to badly I guess.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

That's because pewdiepie had to make a real one after the first flop and it ruined their motivation.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The image OP posted explicitly shows that’s not true.

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Okay so half decade forgive my memory.

Point stands, there are no new ones.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 20 points 1 day ago

"Unlisted" means you can't find any of them via search or on the creator's page. But if you still have the URL, you can view them directly

Which includes public playlists other people have created

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've been on YouTube from pretty much the start and have never seen a Rewind. Do only Americans get them?

[–] Periodicchair@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

They were a video published and produced by Youtube themselves, showing the most popular videos on the platform, making jokes, etc. It's the same video for everyone. It's not like the "rewinds" some companies do showing your activity for the year.

Here is 2013( I think this was the best one).

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

To this day I still have no idea what it is, and I don't wanna bother looking it up.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

So they invite a select group of artists from the platform who made big gains that year to be a part of something like a YouTube holiday special.

The problem with it is corporate is so out of touch that in 2018 they invited mid-controversy Will Smith and a bunch of K-Pop stars to do the video, almost plays like their target audience is barely pubescent boys and girls. It became less about the community and more about promoting content for monetary purposes.

The YouTube Rewind videos are in the list of the most disliked videos of all time, with the 2018 Rewind being at 20 Million dislikes, surpassing "Baby Shark Dance" at just under 15 Million and "Justin Beiber - Baby" at 12 Million.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago

That was just about the time they got rid of public downvotes, unsurprisingly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 11 points 17 hours ago

It's where they take every video uploaded to YouTube that year and play all of them backwards.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›