this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
131 points (98.5% liked)

World News

51107 readers
1777 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is a hacker’s dream. Even in the face of repeated warnings to protect online accounts, a new study reveals that “admin” is the most commonly used password in the UK.

The second most popular, “123456”, is also unlikely to keep hackers at bay.

It’s not just a problem here – Australians, Americans and Germans also use “admin” more than any other password when accessing websites, apps and logging in to their computers. Around the world, “123456” emerges as the most popular.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Luckily for me my password is ******

Edit: weird lemmy automatically replaced my password with '*'

[–] lemmyng@piefed.ca 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

It really works! I only see ******* !

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 23 hours ago
[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago
[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The second most popular, “123456”, is also unlikely to keep hackers at bay.

That's what I use on my luggage

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You should enable MFA on your luggage

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You know you say that more than likely in jest....

But that's honestly not a terrible idea.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

No, it is a terrible idea. The lock is not the weak point on the luggage, it's the zipper.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

That's very true! That zipper makes a great case for hard luggage that clamps closed.

Pelican I think makes really good luggage but with pelican comes the cost.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

Overall I think the weakest part of luggage is its unusually high liklihood of attack by state adversaries. :p

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

12345 was made popular by a documentary several years ago. So I updated my luggage.

/s

It's a reference to Spaceballs if you were out of the loop.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

I was out of the loop, thanks for the clarification.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Don't use shit passwords. Don't reuse passwords. Get a password manager. Use 2fa.

[–] not_me@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The more factors, the less secure. Each one you add is another potential exploitable authentication method. It’s only as secure as the least secure MFA method you add.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I mean, how many factors do you advocate for? Two is generally plenty as long as they are good ones.

E.g a passphrase protected ssh key is solid. Similarly protected passkey is good. A TOTP with password is... Not terrible I suppose... SMS would be pretty bad...

[–] HC4L@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Online or offline password manager?

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 12 hours ago

Either or as long as theyre stored encrypted and decrypted on device.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Picked up a keyboard at the thrift with a pink sticky note on the bottom:

user:admin

pass:password

Yes, someone had to write that down.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 14 hours ago

I'm their defense sometimes you have to be reminded that something that terrible was used

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I've "hacked" web apps by logging in with "user - password" or something equally inane.

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

But, my long-time sole password of TrustNo1 should be good right??

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Correct Horse Battery Staple

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world -4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Invent your own hashing algorithm. It’s easy, fool-proof, secure, and reusable without compromising security.

Here’s a few examples: ebay.com password is moc.y4b3-saltyboi69 lemmy.world password is dlr0w.ymm3l-saltyboi69

(These aren’t real btw)

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

people writing password crackers are smarter than that dude

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Most compromised passwords are used by script kiddies in mass attacks, not targeted attacks by elite hacking squads. If a password fails verbatim, they just move on to the next compromised account of millions, not develop pattern recognition software to try to figure out replacement candidates for each website.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Association attacks exist in the wild.

Let's say that this is their ebay account. In that case the reward for unlocking each account is very high, so attackers (even in mass attacks) have incentive to put in more work as long as the work cost per account hacked is less than the average reward and there is a net profit.

I assume in this day and age it's probably also viable to use LLMs for password guessing, as long as it's for a high value account. That unlocks a whole another can of worms and if it was me I'd never use low entropy passwords like "moc.y4b3-saltyboi69"

Perhaps this kind of password is viable if it's for an online service that implements rate limiting, but you also have to consider the case that a site gets hacked and their encrypted database (encrypted by each user's password) makes it onto the web. This has happened a lot recently and makes it ridiculously easy for people to throw their GPUs at the task.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

You sound pretty unqualified to judge smartness.