this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
97 points (96.2% liked)

World News

51217 readers
3243 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chinese fighter jets directed fire-control radar at Japanese military aircraft near Japan's Okinawa islands in two incidents, Japan's defence minister said on Sunday, condemning the move as "dangerous".

"These radar illuminations went beyond what is necessary for the safe flight of aircraft," Shinjiro Koizumi posted on X, adding that Japan had lodged a protest with China over Saturday's "regrettable" incident.

A fire-control radar lock is one of the most threatening acts a military aircraft can take because it signals a potential attack, forcing the targeted aircraft to take evasive action.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just my opinion, but I think Takaichi wants to use China's provocations to justify abolishing article 9. For reference:

Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan renounces war as a means to settle international disputes and prohibits the maintenance of military forces for warfare. This clause was established after World War II to promote peace and prevent Japan from rearming.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_9_of_the_Constitution_of_Japan

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or maybe she's just incompetent. But maybe you're right.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or the middle option: She's incompetent but this is what the people guiding her want.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

None of these are mutually exclusive.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I fear that, for now at least, both sides are enjoying these provocations

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah the nationalists here in Japan really seem eager for a confrontation but I seriously don't see how we intend to win a war with China. Literally, "you and what army?"

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who’s to bet there’s not a strategy being honed since WWII on how to bootstrap an army as fast and effectively as possible?

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We aren't really known for being fast and effective. Even if they rounded us up, we'd just be a bunch of unwilling, untrained normies. We also import most of our fuel and food, so the Chinese could choke us into tapping out.

Obviously, if I needed to defend my family, I would, and the government should stand their ground when it comes to protecting our borders, but it makes zero sense to provoke a bullshit war like many nationalists here are doing.