this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
49 points (93.0% liked)

Europe

7865 readers
822 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Melchior@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Another huge part will be the many Ukrainians, who moved to the Western parts of the country. Especially in combination with the destruction of the war, we likely see the east loosing a lot more population when it is all done.

Also it will be intressting to see what happens to Russia. Their problem is not on the same scale, but imho it is much more likely that the Russians who fleed the war will never return, while there also is a good chance that if Russia looses, the economy will be a complete disaster, whereas Ukraine getting at least some help from the West. So it seems likely to me that a lot of Russians leave the country at that point as well.

[–] Anyone@mander.xyz 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Russia's economy is in for a very rough long-term decline, according to practically all economists from within Russia and abroad, as Putin's war made the situation in the country even worse than it was before.

In 2023, one year after the invasion started, there was an interview with Natalia Zubarevich, a Professor of the Department of Economic And Social Geography of Russia at the Moscow State University, claiming that in Russia ‘there will be no collapses, but rather a viscous, slow sinking into Bbackwardness.' More than two years old, the interview is still highly accurate imho, and Ms. Zubarevich has foreseen everything so far.

Most economist also agree with your mentioned notion that Ukraine will get some help from the West to rebuild the country, and they may even be able to convince some Ukrainian refugees to return, and some migrants to settle in Ukraine.

The same is highly unlikely for Russia, though. Even long before the war, Putin's government led many experts to a devastating conclusion for the brain drain from the country reveals that the Kremlinʼs authoritarian modernization has failed and deepens Russia’s longer-term problems, as the Finnish Institute of International Affairs in 2019 wrote, for example:

It is estimated that 1.6 to 2 million people have emigrated from Russia during the nearly 20-year period of Vladimir Putinʼs rule. In the light of these figures, some researchers talk about the fifth wave of emigration in Russian history. Emigration has accelerated particularly since Putin began his third presidency in 2012, and in 2017, for example, an estimated 377,000 people moved out of Russia.

So there is hope for Ukraine, but I don't know of a single study that says the same about Russia.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Ukraine has a population decline since 1993. The war makes the situation worse, but even returning refugees and a likely baby boom still means that they are in structural decline.

The bigger issue for Russia is honestly Central Asia. With the Russian economy in trouble the income gap is closing. At the same time they are looking for alternatives. South Korea for example is an obvious choice given the situation in the country and the Korean diaspora in Central Asia.

The other big problem for Russia might just be independence movements.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

while there also is a good chance that if Russia looses, the economy will be a complete disaster

Russias economy is held up only on war efforts and even that is starting to shake. Every other business is struggling to get workforce and a lot of the supply chains are lost due to sanctions. It doesn't really matter if they win or lose, economically they'll be in a very difficult situation when the war ends.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

Russia is also facing losing their fossil fuel customers. Even if (big if) the war ends today and sanctions are lifted: There will be a some countries and companies buying russian gas and oil, but Europe has now their new LNG terminals with some long term contracts. We are also building renewable energy in a rapid speed and every solar panel and each new wind turbine is producing energy that Russia can't sell after the war. And that is happening all over the world, which is really bad news for Putins perspective after the war.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

if Russia looses, the economy will be a complete disaster

Their economy is and will be a disaster no matter how the war ends. They've spent everything and then some. Their reserves are gone, their currency became worthless, they lost a million+ of skilled workers, and Europe has all but stopped buying their resources. They're completely fucked. The way things look now, there will be another perestroika.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Even for refugees who still consider themselves temporary refugees it will be difficult to return without a lasting peace. And none of the proposed peace deals so far have the making of a permanent deal.

The only possible way I see it for a lasting peace is the Russians giving up at one point. But that looks unlikely to happen within the next year and Ukraine is going to have troubles just staying in the war without massive foreign aid.

It really is becoming time for Europe to step up and turn the screws on Russia by declaring a no-fly zone and start bombing the everliving shit out of any Russian troops in Ukraine.

[–] Bob@feddit.org 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

It really is becoming time for Europe to step up and turn the screws on Russia by declaring a no-fly zone and start bombing the everliving shit out of any Russian troops in Ukraine.

What do you think the Russians would do if NATO countries start bombing their troops in Ukraine?

[–] Stitch0815@feddit.org 3 points 19 minutes ago

They would not do shit except crying because they can't even defeat Ukrain. How are they supposed to start a second front?

[–] Sepia@mander.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ukraine was facing a population decline already before 2022, and the war made the situation worse. But Ukraine is by far not alone with the problem of a shrinking population as almost the entire world will face it in the next decades. Only a few countries in Central Asia and Africa are exempted. The decline is especially pronounced in China, where the population will decline by a factor of 2.2 in this century reaching ~600 million, down form the current 1.4 billion) as well as in the U.S., and Russia, where fertility rates have fallen below the population replacement level.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

China does not have the problem of a massive war killing a lot of people and creating a massive refugee wave. Ukraine is down to 36million people from 42million in 2022. That is like China loosing 200million people over three years. The natural decline to 600million is the UN estimate for the end of the decade so an annual decline of about 10million.

The only country with somewhat similar issues is Russia, but they do not have as big of a refugee crisis.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like China is probably better equiped to make necessary changes to deal with decreasing population better than most other countries.

[–] Sepia@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Dictatorships dont have the checks and balances. That is just a fact

[–] Sepia@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dictatorships dont have the checks and balances. That is just a fact

And? The trend of a society that gets older and older can't be reversed by dictatorial order. The issue of a countrywide worker shortage can't be cracked down. A lack of resources to pay reasonable pensions is a problem you can't shoot at.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 day ago

You asked why china might be better equipped. I amswered it.

I dont think they can handle this one any better, maybe even worse, than other nations.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Which is why they are always less stable than democracies.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Dictatorships can just tell people not to die and plant new kids

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No. But they dont have a lenghty process to make laws and regulations

[–] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I don't have a lengthy process to deal with nazis and you really sound like one.